On Mon, 19 Jan 2026, Jeff Layton wrote: > > There is another approach we could consider: We could move the > export_operations that are needed for local filehandle access into a > new struct filehandle_operations or something. It does mean adding an > extra pointer to the super_block for the new operations vector, but it > might be more intuitive.
If that sort of change were seen to be valuable, I would rather not create a filehandle_operations but merge some (or all) of export_operations into super_operations. Maybe then the existence of s_export_op would return to mean "NFS export supported" even if it is empty. Thanks, NeilBrown
