On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 08:38 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:35:36PM +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This patch removes a code snippet from check_ea_in_inode() in pass1 > > which checks if the EA values in the inode are sorted or not. The > > comments in fs/ext*/xattr.c state that the EA values in the external > > EA block are sorted but those in the inode need not be sorted. I > > have also attached a test image which has unsorted EAs in the > > inodes. The current e2fsck wrongly clears the EAs in the inode. > > Hmm, have you been able to create test images that have unsorted EA's > in inodes using a standard ext3 kernel implementat? If so, then this > is a patch which we should push to the distro's since it could cause > data loss, and cause serious malfunctions, especially for people who > have SELinux enabled and are using large inodes for the EA-in-inode > feature....
Hi, I saw this problem when I was running a script which created a random number of EAs for a file of random sizes. If you mount the image I have given, all the EAs are displayed and they can be used/modified/deleted without any problems so its not a bug in ext3 code. Thanks, Kalpak. > > - Ted > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
