Kalpak Shah wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 11:18 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
Also can we have a description of why s_{min, want}_extra_isize
fields are added in the commit message ?
The i_extra_isize for each inode should ideally be s_want_extra_isize
after inode expansion. If expansion by s_want_extra_isize is not
possible, then i_extra_isize must be atleast s_min_extra_isize.
My point was that the commit message of ext4-nanosecond-patch should
explain the usage scenario for these variables. We may want to move the
commit message of ext4_expand_inode_extra_isize.patch reworded to this.
BTW i also think that adding s_{min, want}_extra_isize can be a separate
patch altogether.
-aneesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
