On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:01:45 -0700 Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 11:57 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > On Jun 04, 2007 11:32 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: > > > Set the journals JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT on devices with more > > > than 32bit block sizes during mount time. This ensure proper record > > > lenth when writing to the journal. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jose R. Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --- > > > fs/ext4/super.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > > > > > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/fs/ext4/super.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux-2.6.22-rc3.orig/fs/ext4/super.c 2007-06-04 11:01:20.028360650 > > > -0500 > > > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc3/fs/ext4/super.c 2007-06-04 11:05:11.389126418 > > > -0500 > > > @@ -1824,6 +1824,17 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super > > > goto failed_mount3; > > > } > > > > > > + /* > > > + * Make sure to set JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT on filesystems > > > + * with more that 32-bit block counts > > > + */ > > > + if(es->s_blocks_count_hi && > > This need to be le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count_hi) I'm curious, Why do we need to do an endian conversion to check for a non-zero value in s_blocks_count_hi? Seems unnecessary here. -JRS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
