On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 04:35:02PM +0530, Girish Shilamkar wrote:
> The patch changes the order that the config file and command line are parsed 
> so
> that command line has precedence.  

#1)  Could you please wrap your patch headers at about coulmn 72 or so,
please?  Thanks!!

#2) Changing when the config file is parsed doesn't change whether the
command line or the config file has precendence.  Parsing the config
file merely sets up an in-memory parse tree so that C code can query
the contents of the config file, e.g.:

        profile_get_boolean(ctx->profile, "options",
                            "defer_check_on_battery", 0, 1, 
                            &defer_check_on_battery);

Simply moving the profile_init() makes no difference.  Also, none of
the parameters in /etc/e2fsck.conf overlap with what you can specify
on the command-line, so I'm not even sure what the original author
(Jim Garlick) was even trying to get at.

> It also adds a check to make sure only one -E
> option is passed on the command line as -E option parsing is not cumulative.

Yep, this is reasonable.

                                        - Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to