On Jul 25, 2007  11:06 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This helps in reverting the changes if end results
> are not correct.The environment variable TUNE2FS_SCRATCH_DIR
> is used to indicate the  directory within which the tdb
> file need to be created. The file will be named tune2fs-XXXXXX

> @@ -702,6 +705,23 @@ static void parse_tune2fs_options(int argc, char **argv)
>                               break;
> +                     case 'I':
> +                             new_inode_size = strtoul (optarg, &tmp, 0);
> +                             if (!((new_inode_size & (new_inode_size - 1)) 
> == 0)) {
> +                                     com_err (program_name, 0,
> +                                                     _("bad Inode size - 
> %s"),
> +                                                     optarg);
> +                                     usage();
> +                             }

Please print a more useful message like "inode size must be a power of two",
as "bad inode size - 200" isn't very useful to the user to figure out what
a good inode size is.

> +static void *ext2fs_read_next_inode(ext2_filsys fs,
> +                             void *inode, void *inode_table,
> +                             int *retval)
> +{
> +     blk = fs->group_desc[group].bg_inode_table;
> +     *retval = io_channel_read_blk(fs->io, blk,
> +                     fs->inode_blocks_per_group, inode_table);

This isn't doing swabbing of the inodes?

> +}
> +
> +static int ext2fs_write_itb(ext2_filsys fs, int group,
> +                             void *inode_table_block, int free_inodes_count)
> +{
> +     int retval;
> +     int blk = fs->group_desc[group].bg_inode_table;
> +     retval = io_channel_write_blk(fs->io, blk,
> +                             fs->inode_blocks_per_group, inode_table_block);

This isn't doing swabbing either?

> +static int resize_inode(ext2_filsys fs, unsigned long int new_inode_size)
> +{
> +     ext2_ino_t inode_num;
> +     int itable_size, retval;
> +     int new_inode_per_group, new_max_inode;
> +     int copied_inode_count = 0;
> +     void *inode, *buf, *tmp_buf, *inode_table;
> +     int free_inodes_count = 0, group_count = 0;
> +     int old_size = EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super);
> +     int max_group = fs->super->s_inodes_count/fs->super->s_inodes_per_group;
> +
> +     if (new_inode_size <= fs->super->s_inode_size ) {
> +             fprintf(stderr, _("New Inode size too small\n"));
> +             return EXT2_ET_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
> +     }

Shouldn't this be verified when the inode size is parsed instead of down here?

> +     if (I_flag) {
> +             if (mount_flags & EXT2_MF_MOUNTED) {
> +                     fputs(_("The Inode size may only be "
> +                             "changed when the filesystem is "
> +                             "unmounted.\n"), stderr);

Why do you capitalize "Inode" in all of the messages?

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to