This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled
Subject: "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" uses __u32 to receive physical block
number
to the 2.6.22-stable tree. Its filename is
ext4_ext_put_in_cache-uses-__u32-to-receive-physical-block-number.patch
A git repo of this tree can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 31 00:48:13 2007
From: Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:37:46 -0700
Subject: "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" uses __u32 to receive physical block number
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yan Zheng wrote:
> I think I found a bug in ext4/extents.c, "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" uses
> "__u32" to receive physical block number. "ext4_ext_put_in_cache" is
> used in "ext4_ext_get_blocks", it sets ext4 inode's extent cache
> according most recently tree lookup (higher 16 bits of saved physical
> block number are always zero). when serving a mapping request,
> "ext4_ext_get_blocks" first check whether the logical block is in
> inode's extent cache. if the logical block is in the cache and the
> cached region isn't a gap, "ext4_ext_get_blocks" gets physical block
> number by using cached region's physical block number and offset in
> the cached region. as described above, "ext4_ext_get_blocks" may
> return wrong result when there are physical block numbers bigger than
> 0xffffffff.
>
You are right. Thanks for reporting this!
Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Yan Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c~ext4_ext_put_in_cache-uses-__u32-to-receive-physical
+++ a/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *in
static void
ext4_ext_put_in_cache(struct inode *inode, __u32 block,
- __u32 len, __u32 start, int type)
+ __u32 len, ext4_fsblk_t start, int type)
{
struct ext4_ext_cache *cex;
BUG_ON(len == 0);
_
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] are
queue-2.6.22/ext4_ext_put_in_cache-uses-__u32-to-receive-physical-block-number.patch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
