On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:42:47 -0700
Andreas Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 03, 2007 13:05 -0600, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> > @@ -600,6 +600,7 @@ void ext4_free_blocks_sb(handle_t *handle, struct
> > super_block *sb,
> > ext4_grpblk_t group_freed;
> > + ext4_group_t meta_group;
>
> Please do not call these meta_groups. This already means something very
> specific (i.e. desc_per_block groups) and using it for FLEX_BG is confusing.
> One possibly desirable relation is if the FLEX_BG count is some integer or
> power-of-two multiple of the metabg count. That would allow the FLEX_BG
> code to share the same in-memory group struct as the mballoc code and save
> on some memory overhead.
Yes, need to clean the naming on some of these. I also need to look
into the mballoc code to see if there is anything I can reuse.
> > + meta_group = ext4_meta_group(sbi, block_group);
> > +
> > spin_lock(&sbi->s_meta_groups[meta_group].meta_group_lock);
> > + sbi->s_meta_groups[meta_group].free_inodes++;
> > + if (is_directory)
> > + sbi->s_meta_groups[meta_group].num_dirs--;
> > +
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->s_meta_groups[meta_group].meta_group_lock);
>
> This can be as many as hundreds or thousands of spin locks. Why not use
> the same hashed locking code as the group descriptors themselves?
>
> spin_lock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, meta_group));
> spin_unlock(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, meta_group));
>
> This scales with the number of CPUs and chance of contention is very low.
Excellent. I was thinking that one spinlock per flex_bg was overkill
as well but I did not know the existence of blockgroup_lock.h.
> > +int find_group_meta(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent)
> > +{
> > + ext4_group_t parent_mgroup = parent_group / sbi->s_groups_per_meta;
>
> This could use ext4_meta_group(sbi, parent_group)?
Yes, thanks for catching.
> > +static inline ext4_group_t ext4_meta_group(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi,
> > + ext4_group_t block_group)
> > +{
> > + return block_group/sbi->s_groups_per_meta;
> > +}
>
> It would be preferable to limit s_groups_per_meta to be a power-of-two
> so that this can become a shift instead of a divide.
Seems like I always fall into the same trap. I'll change this.
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
>
Thanks.
-JRS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
