Hi, Fan,

On 2016/2/24 15:57, Fan Li wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 12:08 PM
>> To: Fan Li
>> Cc: 'Junling Zheng'; heyun...@huawei.com; 
>> linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs-tools: set segment_count in super 
>> block correctly
>>
>> Hi Fan,
>>
>> Could you resubmit the final patch?
>> I'll remove the previous patch merged into dev branch.
> 
> I think removing the patch would be sufficient enough.
> Sorry for the trouble. It's my first time to acquire the code of f2fs-tools,
> There seems to be a mistake.
> 

However, it seems that the problem you mentioned before still exists.

Now, segment_count_main is aligned with zone size, but segment_count not, which 
may cause:

main_blkaddr + (segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
        segment0_blkaddr + (segment_count << log_blocks_per_seg)

then, mount will fail.

So, we still need to align segment_count with zone size:)

Thanks,

>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:33:55PM +0800, Fan Li wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Junling Zheng [mailto:zhengjunl...@huawei.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 10:52 AM
>>>> To: Fan Li; 'Jaegeuk Kim'; heyun...@huawei.com
>>>> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs-tools: set segment_count in
>>>> super block correctly
>>>>
>>>> On 2016/2/3 13:29, Fan Li wrote:
>>>>> Now f2fs will check statistics recorded in super block in
>>>>> sanity_check_area_boundary() during mount,if number of segments
>>>>> per section is greater than 1, and the disk space isn't aligned
>>>>> with section,
>>>>
>>>> Hi Fan, Hi Kim:
>>>>
>>>> I'm uncertain about which unit the disk space should be aligned with? 
>>>> section or zone?
>>>>
>>>> It looks like commit "e9dfbbb"(mkfs.f2fs: introduce zone align for
>>>> main area)
>>>>
>>>> from Yunlei had changed the aligning unit from section to zone.
>>>>
>>>> So, should segment_count in superblock be aligned with zone rather than 
>>>> section?
>>>
>>> I'm afraid that my codes of mkfs is too old, it doesn't contain this
>>> patch, and it still uses section size to align main area.
>>>
>>> Of course if main area should be aligned with zone, the following
>>> patch should be modified accordingly.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Junling
>>>>
>>>>> mount will fail due to following condition:
>>>>>
>>>>> main_blkaddr + (segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) !=
>>>>>           segment0_blkaddr + (segment_count << log_blocks_per_seg)
>>>>>
>>>>> this is because when the length of main area isn't aligned with
>>>>> section, mkfs didn't add the number of excess segments to
>>>>> segment_count_main, but add it to segment_count.
>>>>> Here align segment_count with section size first to prevent such problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Fan Li <fanofcode...@samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  mkfs/f2fs_format.c |    3 ++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c b/mkfs/f2fs_format.c index
>>>>> 66d7342..3366302 100644
>>>>> --- a/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
>>>>> +++ b/mkfs/f2fs_format.c
>>>>> @@ -174,7 +174,8 @@ static int f2fs_prepare_super_block(void)
>>>>>         }
>>>>>
>>>>>         set_sb(segment_count, (config.total_sectors * config.sector_size -
>>>>> -                               zone_align_start_offset) / 
>>>>> segment_size_bytes);
>>>>> +                               zone_align_start_offset) / 
>>>>> segment_size_bytes /
>>>>> +                               config.segs_per_sec *
>>>>> + config.segs_per_sec);
>>>>>
>>>>>         set_sb(segment0_blkaddr, zone_align_start_offset / 
>>>>> blk_size_bytes);
>>>>>         sb->cp_blkaddr = sb->segment0_blkaddr;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> .
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to