On 02/11, Sheng Yong wrote: > Hi, Jaegeuk > > On 2018/2/10 10:50, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 02/06, Sheng Yong wrote: > > > This patchset introduces lost+found feature in f2fs. If the feature is > > > enabled, f2fs should avoid to encrypting root directory. > > > > In that case, we need to add test_dummy_encryption likewise ext4. > > > If the test_dummy_encryption is only used for some a testcase, I think > it's ok not to add it. The lost_found feature is not enabled by default, > so if we don't specify "-O lost_found" for mkfs, root directory is allowed > to be encrypted. If I miss something, please let me know :)
No, we have to be able to test lost_found with encryption. :) Thanks, > > thanks, > Sheng > > > > > > > For more information, please check the mail "f2fs-tools: introduce lost+ > > > found feature". > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Sheng > > > > > > Sheng Yong (2): > > > f2fs: clean up f2fs_sb_has_xxx functions > > > f2fs: introduce lost+found feature > > > > > > fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +- > > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 53 > > > +++++++++++++++-------------------------------------- > > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 6 +++--- > > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 ++-- > > > fs/f2fs/super.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++------- > > > fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 4 ++-- > > > 6 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.11.0 > > > > . > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
