On 07/09, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/7/7 5:09, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This fixes to support unaligned dio as buffered writes.
> 
> Should we return -EINVAL as manual of write said:
> 
> EINVAL fd is attached to an object which is unsuitable for writing; or the 
> file
> was opened with the O_DIRECT flag,  and  either  the  address
> specified in buf, the value specified in count, or the current file offset is
> not suitably aligned.

I came from many xfstests failures regarding to direct IO error. It seems other
filesystems allow buffered writes as well.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index e66379961804..6e8e78bb64a7 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -2425,7 +2425,7 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, 
> > struct iov_iter *iter)
> >  
> >     err = check_direct_IO(inode, iter, offset);
> >     if (err)
> > -           return err;
> > +           return 0;
> >  
> >     if (f2fs_force_buffered_io(inode, rw))
> >             return 0;
> > 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to