On 08/16, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2018/8/16 9:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > On 08/15, Ju Hyung Park wrote: > >> btrfs also distinguishes high/low end SSDs with mount option "ssd" and > >> "ssd_spread". > >> I believe there is no implementation inside btrfs to do it automatically. > >> > >> Providing users an option with a well made documentation is acceptable imo. > > > > Yeah, I was thinking about this as well. How about adding "-o disk=%s" where > > %s can be ufs/emmc/ssd/low_ssd/nvme/...? > > Agreed, > > > And, we also can decide the device type automatically w/ kmsg by default. > > You mean by scanning kmsg to see the device type?
No, I was seeking for a way to find in block device structure, if exists. > > Thanks, > > > > >> > >> And I personally think, if the default goes to a dynamically deciding > >> method, it should tell it to kmsg. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018, 12:31 PM Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 2018/8/15 11:20, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>> On 08/15, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>> On 2018/8/15 10:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>>>> On 08/15, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2018/8/15 10:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 08/15, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On 2018/8/15 1:23, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 08/14, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018/8/14 12:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/10, Chao Yu wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Previously, discard speed was fixed mostly, and in high usage > >>> rate > >>>>>>>>>>>>> device, we will speed up issuing discard, but it doesn't make > >>> sense > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that in a non-full filesystem, we still issue discard with slow > >>> speed. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Could you please elaborate the problem in more detail? The speed > >>> depends > >>>>>>>>>>>> on how many candidates? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> undiscard blocks are all 4k granularity. > >>>>>>>>>>> a) utility: filesystem: 20% + undiscard blocks: 20% = flash > >>> storage: 40% > >>>>>>>>>>> b) utility: filesystem: 40% + undiscard blocks: 25% = flash > >>> storage: 65% > >>>>>>>>>>> c) utility: filesystem: 60% + undiscard blocks: 30% = flash > >>> storage: 100% > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1. for case c), we need to speed up issuing discard based on > >>> utilization of > >>>>>>>>>>> "filesystem + undiscard" instead of just utilization of > >>> filesystem. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> - if (utilization(sbi) > DEF_DISCARD_URGENT_UTIL) { > >>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->granularity = 1; > >>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->max_interval = > >>> DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>> - } > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2. If free space in storage touches therein threshold, > >>> performance will be very > >>>>>>>>>>> sensitive. In low-end storage, with high usage in space, even > >>> free space is > >>>>>>>>>>> reduced by 1%, performance will decrease a lot. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> So, we may need to distinguish low-end vs. high-end storage. In > >>> high-end case, > >>>>>>>>>> it'd be better to avoid IO contention, while low-end device wants > >>> to get more > >>>>>>>>>> discard commands as much as possible. So, how about adding an > >>> option for this > >>>>>>>>>> as a tunable point? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Agreed, how about adding a sysfs entry discard_tunning: > >>>>>>>>> 1: enabled, use 4k granularity, self-adapted speed based on real > >>> device free space. > >>>>>>>>> 0: disabled, use dcc->discard_granularity, fixed speed. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> By default: enabled > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> How do you think? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I don't think this is proper with a sysfs entry, since we already > >>> know the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You mean by storage capacity? <= 32GB means low-end? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, that's current condition to judge it. If there is any other > >>> method, it'd be > >>>>> > >>>>> That would be hard code... > >>>>> > >>>>> Still I have not got any other method to do the judgment except > >>> capacity. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe ufs or emmc? > >>> > >>> Yeah, that's may be a good way. > >>> > >>> I remember very initial version UFS has very poor discard performance, for > >>> that > >>> kind of storage, it will be not accurate? > >>> > >>> Let me check whether there is a flag to distinguish ufs/emmc. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>>> better to change it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> device type when mounting the partition. We won't require to change > >>> the policy > >>>>>>>> on the fly. And, I still don't get to change the default. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> IMO, in above cases, we'd better to issue discard with high speed > >>> for c), middle > >>>>>>>>>>> speed for b), and low speed for a). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> How do you think? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyway, it comes out undiscarded block makes FTL GC be lower > >>> efficient > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and causing high lifetime overhead. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's tune discard speed as below: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a. adjust default issue interval: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> original after > >>>>>>>>>>>>> min_interval: 50ms 100ms > >>>>>>>>>>>>> mid_interval: 500ms 1000ms > >>>>>>>>>>>>> max_interval: 60000ms 10000ms > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> b. if last time we stop issuing discard due to IO interruption > >>> of user, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> let's reset all {min,mid,max}_interval to default one. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> c. tune {min,mid,max}_interval with below calculation method: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> base_interval = default_interval / 10; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> total_interval = default_interval - base_interval; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> interval = base_interval + total_interval * (100 - dev_util) / > >>> 100; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For example: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> min_interval (:100ms) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dev_util (%) interval (ms) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0 100 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 10 91 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 82 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 73 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 80 28 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 90 19 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 100 10 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 11 ++++---- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 64 > >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.h | 9 +++++++ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 2 +- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >>>>>>>>>>>>> index 273ffdaf4891..a1dd2e1c3cb9 100644 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -185,10 +185,9 @@ enum { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #define MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS(sbi) BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST 8 /* issue 8 > >>> discards per round */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -#define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 50 /* 50 ms, if > >>> exists */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -#define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 500 /* 500 ms, if > >>> device busy */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 60000 /* 60 s, if no > >>> candidates */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -#define DEF_DISCARD_URGENT_UTIL 80 /* do more > >>> discard over 80% */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 100 /* 100 ms, if > >>> exists */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 1000 /* 1000 ms, if > >>> device busy */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME 10000 /* 10000 ms, if no > >>> candidates */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #define DEF_CP_INTERVAL 60 /* 60 secs > >>> */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #define DEF_IDLE_INTERVAL 5 /* 5 secs */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -248,7 +247,8 @@ struct discard_entry { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> }; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> /* default discard granularity of inner discard thread, unit: > >>> block count */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -#define DEFAULT_DISCARD_GRANULARITY 1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define MID_DISCARD_GRANULARITY 16 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +#define MIN_DISCARD_GRANULARITY 1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> /* max discard pend list number */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #define MAX_PLIST_NUM 512 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ struct discard_cmd_control { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> atomic_t discard_cmd_cnt; /* # of cached cmd > >>> count */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> struct rb_root root; /* root of discard > >>> rb-tree */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> bool rbtree_check; /* config for > >>> consistence check */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + bool io_interrupted; /* last state of > >>> io interrupted */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> }; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> /* for the list of fsync inodes, used only during recovery */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > >>>>>>>>>>>>> index 8b52e8dfb12f..9564aaf1f27b 100644 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -968,6 +968,44 @@ static void __check_sit_bitmap(struct > >>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> #endif > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void __adjust_discard_speed(unsigned int *interval, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int def_interval, int > >>> dev_util) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +{ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int base_interval, total_interval; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + base_interval = def_interval / 10; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + total_interval = def_interval - base_interval; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + /* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + * if def_interval = 100, adjusted interval should be in > >>> range of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + * [10, 100]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + *interval = base_interval + total_interval * (100 - > >>> dev_util) / 100; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +} > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +static void __tune_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct discard_policy > >>> *dpolicy) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +{ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + int dev_util; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (dcc->io_interrupted) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dpolicy->min_interval = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dpolicy->mid_interval = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dpolicy->max_interval = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + return; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dev_util = dev_utilization(sbi); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + __adjust_discard_speed(&dpolicy->min_interval, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME, > >>> dev_util); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + __adjust_discard_speed(&dpolicy->mid_interval, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME, > >>> dev_util); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + __adjust_discard_speed(&dpolicy->max_interval, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME, > >>> dev_util); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +} > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> static void __init_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> struct discard_policy *dpolicy, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> int discard_type, unsigned int > >>> granularity) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -982,20 +1020,11 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct > >>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpolicy->io_aware_gran = MAX_PLIST_NUM; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (discard_type == DPOLICY_BG) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->min_interval = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->mid_interval = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->max_interval = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpolicy->io_aware = true; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpolicy->sync = false; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpolicy->ordered = true; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - if (utilization(sbi) > DEF_DISCARD_URGENT_UTIL) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->granularity = 1; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->max_interval = > >>> DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + __tune_discard_policy(sbi, dpolicy); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FORCE) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->min_interval = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->mid_interval = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dpolicy->max_interval = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpolicy->io_aware = false; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dpolicy->io_aware = false; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1353,6 +1382,8 @@ static unsigned int > >>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!issued && io_interrupted) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issued = -1; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dcc->io_interrupted = io_interrupted; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> return issued; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1370,7 +1401,7 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct > >>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (i + 1 < dpolicy->granularity) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> break; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - if (i < DEFAULT_DISCARD_GRANULARITY && > >>> dpolicy->ordered) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + if (i < MID_DISCARD_GRANULARITY && > >>> dpolicy->ordered) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> return __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(sbi, > >>> dpolicy); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> pend_list = &dcc->pend_list[i]; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1407,6 +1438,8 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct > >>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!issued && io_interrupted) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> issued = -1; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dcc->io_interrupted = io_interrupted; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> return issued; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1576,7 +1609,11 @@ static int issue_discard_thread(void > >>> *data) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = data; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wait_queue_head_t *q = &dcc->discard_wait_queue; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - struct discard_policy dpolicy; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + struct discard_policy dpolicy = { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + .min_interval = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + .mid_interval = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + .max_interval = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + }; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> unsigned int wait_ms = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> int issued; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1929,7 +1966,7 @@ static int > >>> create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!dcc) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> return -ENOMEM; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - dcc->discard_granularity = DEFAULT_DISCARD_GRANULARITY; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dcc->discard_granularity = MIN_DISCARD_GRANULARITY; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dcc->entry_list); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < MAX_PLIST_NUM; i++) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dcc->pend_list[i]); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -1945,6 +1982,7 @@ static int > >>> create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dcc->next_pos = 0; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dcc->root = RB_ROOT; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> dcc->rbtree_check = false; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dcc->io_interrupted = false; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> init_waitqueue_head(&dcc->discard_wait_queue); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info = dcc; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h > >>>>>>>>>>>>> index 422b0ceb1eaa..63b4da72cd34 100644 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -616,6 +616,15 @@ static inline int utilization(struct > >>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sbi->user_block_count); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +static inline int dev_utilization(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +{ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + unsigned int dev_blks; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + dev_blks = valid_user_blocks(sbi) + > >>> SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->undiscard_blks; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + return div_u64((u64)dev_blks * 100, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg); > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +} > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + > >>>>>>>>>>>>> /* > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Sometimes f2fs may be better to drop out-of-place update > >>> policy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> * And, users can control the policy through sysfs entries. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > >>>>>>>>>>>>> index b055f2ea77c5..55ed76daad23 100644 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > >>>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > >>>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -2862,7 +2862,7 @@ static void f2fs_tuning_parameters(struct > >>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > >>>>>>>>>>>>> /* adjust parameters according to the volume size */ > >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (sm_i->main_segments <= SMALL_VOLUME_SEGMENTS) { > >>>>>>>>>>>>> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).alloc_mode = ALLOC_MODE_REUSE; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - sm_i->dcc_info->discard_granularity = 1; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> + sm_i->dcc_info->discard_granularity = > >>> MIN_DISCARD_GRANULARITY; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> sm_i->ipu_policy = 1 << F2FS_IPU_FORCE; > >>>>>>>>>>>>> } > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.18.0.rc1 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> . > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> . > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> . > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> . > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> . > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list > >>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel > >>> > > > > . > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel