On 04/20, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/4/17 2:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/02, Hagbard Celine wrote:
> >> Hi, I lost the root filesystem on my previous install after a few
> >> weeks of several power outages last winter. While trying to recover I
> >> discovered that it seem fsck was never run properly during boot in the
> >> lifetime of that install.
> >> After getting the system installed again a while ago, I have been
> >> trying to discern why.
> >> So far I've found the following two possible issues:
> >>
> >> ISSUE 1:
> >> If I boot with kernel option "ro rootfstype=f2fs
> >> rootflags=background_gc=on,heap,disable_ext_identify,discard,user_xattr,inline_xattr,inline_dentry,acl,inline_data,flush_merge,data_flush,extent_cache,whint_mode=fs-based,fsync_mode=strict"
> >> I get the following halfway trough boot:
> >>
> >>  * Checking local filesystems  ...
> >> Info: Use default preen mode
> >> Info: Mounted device!
> >> Info: Check FS only due to RO
> >>         Error: Failed to open the device!
> >>  * Filesystems couldn't be fixed
> >>
> >>
> >>                      [ !! ] * rc: Aborting!
> >>
> >> If i from this state try to mount another partition:
> >> # mount -o 
> >> "ro,relatime,lazytime,background_gc=on,discard,heap,user_xattr,inline_xattr,acl,disable_ext_identify,inline_data,inline_dentry,flush_merge,extent_cache,data_flush,mode=adaptive,active_logs=6,whint_mode=fs-based,alloc_mode=default,fsync_mode=strict"
> >> /dev/nvme0n1p7 /mnt/f2fstest/
> >>
> >> I get the same error if I try to run fsck on it:
> >> # fsck.f2fs /dev/nvme0n1p7
> >> Info: Mounted device!
> >> Info: Check FS only due to RO
> >>         Error: Failed to open the device!
> >>
> >> If I on the other had boot with kernel option "rw rootfstype=f2fs
> >> rootflags=background_gc=on,heap,disable_ext_identify,discard,user_xattr,inline_xattr,inline_dentry,acl,inline_data,flush_merge,data_flush,extent_cache,whint_mode=fs-based,fsync_mode=strict
> >> panic=30 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1"
> >>
> >> The boot does not hang and if I try same test as before, mount test 
> >> partition:
> >> # mount -o 
> >> "ro,relatime,lazytime,background_gc=on,discard,heap,user_xattr,inline_xattr,acl,disable_ext_identify,inline_data,inline_dentry,flush_merge,extent_cache,data_flush,mode=adaptive,active_logs=6,whint_mode=fs-based,alloc_mode=default,fsync_mode=strict"
> >> /dev/nvme0n1p7 /mnt/f2fstest/
> >>
> >> Run fsck:
> >> # fsck.f2fs  -f /dev/nvme0n1p7
> >> Info: Force to fix corruption
> >> Info: Mounted device!
> >> Info: Check FS only due to RO
> >> Info: Segments per section = 1
> >> Info: Sections per zone = 1
> >> Info: sector size = 512
> >> Info: total sectors = 134101647 (65479 MB)
> >> Info: MKFS version
> >>   "Linux version 5.0.5-gentoof2fsfix (root@40o2) (gcc version 8.2.0
> >> (Gentoo 8.2.0-r6 p1.7)) #2 SMP PREEMPT Mon Apr 1 17:04:41 +01 2019"
> >> Info: FSCK version
> >>   from "Linux version 5.0.5-gentoo (root@40o2) (gcc version 8.2.0
> >> (Gentoo 8.2.0-r6 p1.7)) #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Apr 2 07:42:40 +01 2019"
> >>     to "Linux version 5.0.5-gentoo (root@40o2) (gcc version 8.2.0
> >> (Gentoo 8.2.0-r6 p1.7)) #2 SMP PREEMPT Tue Apr 2 07:42:40 +01 2019"
> >> Info: superblock features = 0 :
> >> Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt = 00000000000000000000000000000000
> >> Info: total FS sectors = 134101640 (65479 MB)
> >> Info: CKPT version = 70e1454a
> >> Info: Checked valid nat_bits in checkpoint
> >> Info: checkpoint state = 4c1 :  large_nat_bitmap nat_bits crc unmount
> >>
> >> [FSCK] Unreachable nat entries                        [Ok..] [0x0]
> >> [FSCK] SIT valid block bitmap checking                [Ok..]
> >> [FSCK] Hard link checking for regular file            [Ok..] [0x70]
> >> [FSCK] valid_block_count matching with CP             [Ok..] [0x1fe244]
> >> [FSCK] valid_node_count matcing with CP (de lookup)   [Ok..] [0x6c487]
> >> [FSCK] valid_node_count matcing with CP (nat lookup)  [Ok..] [0x6c487]
> >> [FSCK] valid_inode_count matched with CP              [Ok..] [0x6c362]
> >> [FSCK] free segment_count matched with CP             [Ok..] [0x6c44]
> >> [FSCK] next block offset is free                      [Ok..]
> >> [FSCK] fixing SIT types
> >> [FSCK] other corrupted bugs                           [Ok..]
> >>
> >> Done.
> >>
> >> So a system booted with "rw" root can fsck an "ro" filesystem but a
> >> system booted with root "ro" can not.
> >>
> >>
> >> ISSUE 2:
> >> Referring to the output from the fsck running against a "ro"
> >> filesystem, especially this line:
> >> Info: Check FS only due to RO
> >>
> >> As far as i can tell this says that opposed to other filesystems
> >> running fsck against a "ro" mounted f2fs partition will never fix any
> >> errors.
> >> So I tried running fsck against the same partition mounted "rw":
> >> # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/f2fstest/
> >> # fsck.f2fs  -f /dev/nvme0n1p7
> >> Info: Force to fix corruption
> >> Info: Mounted device!
> >>         Error: Not available on mounted device!
> >>
> >> I might be misunderstanding something, but all this tells me that
> >> unless one make a custom initramfs that runs fsck before root is
> >> mounted (something no distributions has, as far as I know), fsck will
> >> never fix an f2fs formatted root partition during boot.
> >> If this is by design and not a bug/unintended behavior, it should be
> >> documented somewhere least more people will experience system crashes
> >> like mine.
> >>
> >> All tests above done with kernel 5.0.5 and f2fs-tools 1.12.0 with
> >> "fsck.f2fs: allow to fsck readonly image w/ -f option"-patch by Chao
> >> Yu.
> > 
> > Hi Hagbard,
> > 
> > It looks like fsck.f2fs failed to open a device as RW on RO disk. Could you
> > try this patch?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> >>From 3f18ff744f4d510d8e2f42c5a3b2539651baccc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:46:31 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: open ro disk if we want to check fs only
> > 
> > This patch fixes the "open failure" issue on ro disk, reported by Hagbard.
> > 
> > "
> >  If I boot with kernel option "ro rootfstype=f2fs
> >  I get the following halfway trough boot:
> > 
> >   * Checking local filesystems  ...
> >  Info: Use default preen mode
> >  Info: Mounted device!
> >  Info: Check FS only due to RO
> >          Error: Failed to open the device!
> >   * Filesystems couldn't be fixed
> > "
> > 
> > Reported-by: Hagbard Celine <hagbardce...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  lib/libf2fs.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/libf2fs.c b/lib/libf2fs.c
> > index f8f6921..1a0d179 100644
> > --- a/lib/libf2fs.c
> > +++ b/lib/libf2fs.c
> > @@ -818,9 +818,16 @@ int get_device_info(int i)
> >     unsigned char model_inq[6] = {MODELINQUIRY};
> >  #endif
> >     struct device_info *dev = c.devices + i;
> > +   int rw_flag;
> > +
> > +   /* Check FS only */
> > +   if (c.fix_on == 0 && c.auto_fix == 0)
> > +           rw_flag = O_RDONLY;
> > +   else
> > +           rw_flag = O_RDWR;
> >  
> >     if (c.sparse_mode) {
> > -           fd = open(dev->path, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_BINARY, 0644);
> > +           fd = open(dev->path, rw_flag | O_CREAT | O_BINARY, 0644);
> >             if (fd < 0) {
> >                     MSG(0, "\tError: Failed to open a sparse file!\n");
> >                     return -1;
> > @@ -838,9 +845,9 @@ int get_device_info(int i)
> >             }
> >  
> >             if (S_ISBLK(stat_buf->st_mode) && !c.force)
> > -                   fd = open(dev->path, O_RDWR | O_EXCL);
> > +                   fd = open(dev->path, rw_flag | O_EXCL);
> >             else
> > -                   fd = open(dev->path, O_RDWR);
> > +                   fd = open(dev->path, rw_flag);
> >     }
> >     if (fd < 0) {
> >             MSG(0, "\tError: Failed to open the device!\n");
> 
> Jaegeuk,
> 
> Last merged patch wasn't sent out..., so I just reply on this old one.
> 
>               if (S_ISBLK(stat_buf->st_mode) && !c.force) {
> 
> Shouldn't be (.. && c.force) ?

This has nothing to do with this patch tho, it looks good since, in normal case,
we'd better O_EXCL, but in the force mode, we'd like to open the device freely.

New version of the patch is:

>From 3221692b060649378f1f69b898ed85a814af3dbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:46:31 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fsck.f2fs: open ro disk if we want to check fs only

This patch fixes the "open failure" issue on ro disk, reported by Hagbard.

"
 If I boot with kernel option "ro rootfstype=f2fs
 I get the following halfway trough boot:

  * Checking local filesystems  ...
 Info: Use default preen mode
 Info: Mounted device!
 Info: Check FS only due to RO
         Error: Failed to open the device!
  * Filesystems couldn't be fixed
"

Reported-by: Hagbard Celine <hagbardce...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
---
 lib/libf2fs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/libf2fs.c b/lib/libf2fs.c
index d30047f..853e713 100644
--- a/lib/libf2fs.c
+++ b/lib/libf2fs.c
@@ -789,6 +789,15 @@ void get_kernel_uname_version(__u8 *version)
 #endif /* APPLE_DARWIN */
 
 #ifndef ANDROID_WINDOWS_HOST
+static int open_check_fs(char *path, int flag)
+{
+       if (c.func != FSCK || c.fix_on || c.auto_fix)
+               return -1;
+
+       /* allow to open ro */
+       return open(path, O_RDONLY | flag);
+}
+
 int get_device_info(int i)
 {
        int32_t fd = 0;
@@ -810,8 +819,11 @@ int get_device_info(int i)
        if (c.sparse_mode) {
                fd = open(dev->path, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_BINARY, 0644);
                if (fd < 0) {
-                       MSG(0, "\tError: Failed to open a sparse file!\n");
-                       return -1;
+                       fd = open_check_fs(dev->path, O_BINARY);
+                       if (fd < 0) {
+                               MSG(0, "\tError: Failed to open a sparse 
file!\n");
+                               return -1;
+                       }
                }
        }
 
@@ -825,10 +837,15 @@ int get_device_info(int i)
                        return -1;
                }
 
-               if (S_ISBLK(stat_buf->st_mode) && !c.force)
+               if (S_ISBLK(stat_buf->st_mode) && !c.force) {
                        fd = open(dev->path, O_RDWR | O_EXCL);
-               else
+                       if (fd < 0)
+                               fd = open_check_fs(dev->path, O_EXCL);
+               } else {
                        fd = open(dev->path, O_RDWR);
+                       if (fd < 0)
+                               fd = open_check_fs(dev->path, 0);
+               }
        }
        if (fd < 0) {
                MSG(0, "\tError: Failed to open the device!\n");
-- 
2.19.0.605.g01d371f741-goog



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to