On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 10:01:18AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> For subpage-sized blocks, this commit now encrypts all blocks mapped by
> a page range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chan...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/crypto/crypto.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/crypto.c b/fs/crypto/crypto.c
> index 4f0d832cae71..2d65b431563f 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/crypto.c
> +++ b/fs/crypto/crypto.c
> @@ -242,18 +242,26 @@ struct page *fscrypt_encrypt_page(const struct inode 
> *inode,

Need to update the function comment to clearly explain what this function
actually does now.

>  {
>       struct fscrypt_ctx *ctx;
>       struct page *ciphertext_page = page;
> +     int i, page_nr_blks;
>       int err;
>  
>       BUG_ON(len % FS_CRYPTO_BLOCK_SIZE != 0);
>  

Make a 'blocksize' variable so you don't have to keep calling i_blocksize().

Also, you need to check whether 'len' and 'offs' are filesystem-block-aligned,
since the code now assumes it.

        const unsigned int blocksize = i_blocksize(inode);

        if (!IS_ALIGNED(len | offs, blocksize))
                return -EINVAL;

However, did you check whether that's always true for ubifs?  It looks like it
may expect to encrypt a prefix of a block, that is only padded to the next
16-byte boundary.
                
> +     page_nr_blks = len >> inode->i_blkbits;
> +
>       if (inode->i_sb->s_cop->flags & FS_CFLG_OWN_PAGES) {
>               /* with inplace-encryption we just encrypt the page */
> -             err = fscrypt_do_page_crypto(inode, FS_ENCRYPT, lblk_num, page,
> -                                          ciphertext_page, len, offs,
> -                                          gfp_flags);
> -             if (err)
> -                     return ERR_PTR(err);
> -
> +             for (i = 0; i < page_nr_blks; i++) {
> +                     err = fscrypt_do_page_crypto(inode, FS_ENCRYPT,
> +                                             lblk_num, page,
> +                                             ciphertext_page,
> +                                             i_blocksize(inode), offs,
> +                                             gfp_flags);
> +                     if (err)
> +                             return ERR_PTR(err);
> +                     ++lblk_num;
> +                     offs += i_blocksize(inode);
> +             }
>               return ciphertext_page;
>       }
>  
> @@ -269,12 +277,17 @@ struct page *fscrypt_encrypt_page(const struct inode 
> *inode,
>               goto errout;
>  
>       ctx->control_page = page;
> -     err = fscrypt_do_page_crypto(inode, FS_ENCRYPT, lblk_num,
> -                                  page, ciphertext_page, len, offs,
> -                                  gfp_flags);
> -     if (err) {
> -             ciphertext_page = ERR_PTR(err);
> -             goto errout;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < page_nr_blks; i++) {
> +             err = fscrypt_do_page_crypto(inode, FS_ENCRYPT, lblk_num,
> +                                     page, ciphertext_page,
> +                                     i_blocksize(inode), offs, gfp_flags);

As I mentioned elsewhere, renaming fscrypt_do_page_crypto() to
fscrypt_crypt_block() would make more sense now.

> +             if (err) {
> +                     ciphertext_page = ERR_PTR(err);
> +                     goto errout;
> +             }
> +             ++lblk_num;
> +             offs += i_blocksize(inode);
>       }
>       SetPagePrivate(ciphertext_page);
>       set_page_private(ciphertext_page, (unsigned long)ctx);
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to