On 08/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/8/6 8:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 08/02, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2019/8/2 6:35, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 08/01, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>> On 2019/8/1 12:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>> On 07/31, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2019/7/31 7:18, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 07/29, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>>>>> From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Later after this patch was merged, all new incompatible feature's
> >>>>>>>> bit should be added into sb.required_features field, and define new
> >>>>>>>> feature function with F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS() macro.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Then during mount, we will do sanity check with enabled features in
> >>>>>>>> image, if there are features in sb.required_features that kernel can
> >>>>>>>> not recognize, just fail the mount.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>> v3:
> >>>>>>>> - change commit title.
> >>>>>>>> - fix wrong macro name.
> >>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h          | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>  fs/f2fs/super.c         | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>  include/linux/f2fs_fs.h |  3 ++-
> >>>>>>>>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>>>>> index a6eb828af57f..b8e17d4ddb8d 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -163,6 +163,15 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {
> >>>>>>>>  #define F2FS_CLEAR_FEATURE(sbi, mask)                               
> >>>>>>>>         \
> >>>>>>>>      (sbi->raw_super->feature &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask))
> >>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES              0
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>> +#define F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask)                        
> >>>>>>>>         \
> >>>>>>>> +    ((sbi->raw_super->required_features & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0)
> >>>>>>>> +#define F2FS_SET_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask)                        
> >>>>>>>>         \
> >>>>>>>> +    (sbi->raw_super->required_features |= cpu_to_le32(mask))
> >>>>>>>> +#define F2FS_CLEAR_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, mask)                      
> >>>>>>>>         \
> >>>>>>>> +    (sbi->raw_super->required_features &= ~cpu_to_le32(mask))
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>  /*
> >>>>>>>>   * Default values for user and/or group using reserved blocks
> >>>>>>>>   */
> >>>>>>>> @@ -3585,6 +3594,12 @@ F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(lost_found, LOST_FOUND);
> >>>>>>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(sb_chksum, SB_CHKSUM);
> >>>>>>>>  F2FS_FEATURE_FUNCS(casefold, CASEFOLD);
> >>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>> +#define F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE_FUNCS(name, flagname) \
> >>>>>>>> +static inline int f2fs_sb_has_##name(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) \
> >>>>>>>> +{ \
> >>>>>>>> +    return F2FS_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sbi, F2FS_FEATURE_##flagname); 
> >>>>>>>> \
> >>>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> >>>>>>>>  static inline bool f2fs_blkz_is_seq(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int 
> >>>>>>>> devi,
> >>>>>>>>                                  block_t blkaddr)
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >>>>>>>> index 5540fee0fe3f..3701dcce90e6 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> >>>>>>>> @@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct 
> >>>>>>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>>>>>              return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>>      }
> >>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>> +    /* check whether current kernel supports all features on image 
> >>>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>>> +    if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) &
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY   0x0400  /* reserved */
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000
> >>>>>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT  0x1BFF
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>       if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) & 
> >>>>>>> ~F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT) {
> >>>>>>>               ...
> >>>>>>>               return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>       }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Um, I thought .required_features are used to store new feature flags 
> >>>>>> from 0x0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All 'F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT' bits should be stored in sb.feature instead 
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>> sb.required_features, I'm confused...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm thinking,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> f2fs-tools     sb->required_features     f2fs    F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT
> >>>>> v0             0                         v0      no_check -> ok
> >>>>> v1             0x1BFF                    v0      no_check -> ok
> >>>>> v0             0                         v1      0x1BFF -> ok
> >>>>> v1             0x1BFF                    v1      0x1BFF -> ok
> >>>>> v2             0x3BFF                    v1      0x1BFF -> fail
> >>>>> v1             0x1BFF                    v2      0x3BFF -> ok
> >>>>> v2             0x3BFF                    v2      0x3BFF -> ok
> >>>>
> >>>> I see, it's a bit waste for 0x1FFF low bits in sb->required_features. 
> >>>> Why not
> >>>> leaving 0x0FFF in sb->feature w/o sanity check. And make all new 
> >>>> incompatible
> >>>> features (including casefold) adding into sb->required_features.
> >>>
> >>> I don't think we can define like this, and we still have 32bits feature 
> >>> filed.
> >>> This would give another confusion to understand. VERITY is reserved only 
> >>> now.
> >>>
> >>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD             0x0001
> >>
> >> Oops, so you want to make .required_features being almost a mirror of 
> >> .feature,
> >> and do sanity check on it... I can see now. :P
> >>
> >> If so, why not just use .feature:
> > 
> > Sometimes, we don't need to set the flag, but not required at some point.
> > (e.g., verify)
> 
> Sorry, I'm not sure whether I have understood your point... :(
> 
> IIUC of your point, we have defined F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT (0x0BFF) which 
> excludes
> F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY (0x0400) feature bit, then once verity feature merged in
> kernel, we can add it into F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT, any problem we may face here?

I was thinking the cases like "don't care features" made by mkfs. For example,
mkfs can set F2FS_FEATURE_BLKZONED, which doesn't need f2fs being supported.

> 
> Thanks
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> kernel     tool
> >> v5.2 .. 1.12
> >> #define    F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT            0x0BFF
> >>
> >> v5.3 .. 1.13
> >> #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD              0x1000
> >> #define    F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT            0x1BFF
> >>
> >> v5.4 .. 1.14
> >> #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD              0x1000
> >> #define F2FS_FEATURE_COMPRESS              0x2000
> >> #define    F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT            0x3BFF
> >>
> >> f2fs-tools sb->feature             f2fs    F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT
> >>
> >> [enable all features in tools]
> >> v1.12              0x0BFF                  v5.2    no_check -> ok
> >> v1.12              0x0BFF                  v5.3    0x1BFF -> ok
> >> v1.12              0x0BFF                  v5.4    0x3BFF -> ok
> >>
> >> v1.13              0x1BFF                  v5.2    that's issue we need to 
> >> fix
> >> v1.13              0x1BFF                  v5.3    0x1BFF -> ok
> >> v1.13              0x1BFF                  v5.4    0x3BFF -> ok
> >>
> >> v1.14              0x3BFF                  v5.2    that's issue we need to 
> >> fix
> >> v1.14              0x3BFF                  v5.3    0x1BFF -> fail
> >> v1.14              0x3BFF                  v5.4    0x3BFF -> ok
> >>
> >> Or am I missing something?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Then that would be:
> >>>>
> >>>> kernel   tool
> >>>> v5.2 .. 1.12
> >>>> #define  F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT            0x0000
> >>>>
> >>>> v5.3 .. 1.13
> >>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD            0x0001
> >>>> #define  F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT            0x0001
> >>>>
> >>>> v5.4 .. 1.14
> >>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD            0x0001
> >>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_COMPRESS            0x0002
> >>>> #define  F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT            0x0003
> >>>>
> >>>> f2fs-tools       sb->required_features   f2fs    F2FS_FEATURE_SUPPORT
> >>>>
> >>>> v1.12            0x0000                  v5.2    no_check -> ok
> >>>> v1.12            0x0000                  v5.3    0x0001 -> ok
> >>>> v1.12            0x0000                  v5.4    0x0003 -> ok
> >>>>
> >>>> v1.13            0x0001                  v5.2    that's issue we need to 
> >>>> fix
> >>>> v1.13            0x0001                  v5.3    0x0001 -> ok
> >>>> v1.13            0x0001                  v5.4    0x0003 -> ok
> >>>>
> >>>> v1.14            0x0003                  v5.2    that's issue we need to 
> >>>> fix
> >>>> v1.14            0x0003                  v5.3    0x0001 -> fail
> >>>> v1.14            0x0003                  v5.4    0x0003 -> ok
> >>>>
> >>>> And all compatible features can be added into sb->feature[_VERITY, ....].
> >>>>
> >>>> Would that okay to you?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +                    ~F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES) {
> >>>>>>>> +            f2fs_info(sbi, "Unsupported feature: %x: supported: %x",
> >>>>>>>> +                      le32_to_cpu(raw_super->required_features) ^
> >>>>>>>> +                      F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES,
> >>>>>>>> +                      F2FS_INCOMPAT_FEATURES);
> >>>>>>>> +            return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>>> +    }
> >>>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>>>      /* Check checksum_offset and crc in superblock */
> >>>>>>>>      if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)) {
> >>>>>>>>              crc_offset = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->checksum_offset);
> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
> >>>>>>>> index a2b36b2e286f..4141be3f219c 100644
> >>>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
> >>>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/f2fs_fs.h
> >>>>>>>> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ struct f2fs_super_block {
> >>>>>>>>      __u8 hot_ext_count;             /* # of hot file extension */
> >>>>>>>>      __le16  s_encoding;             /* Filename charset encoding */
> >>>>>>>>      __le16  s_encoding_flags;       /* Filename charset encoding 
> >>>>>>>> flags */
> >>>>>>>> -    __u8 reserved[306];             /* valid reserved region */
> >>>>>>>> +    __le32 required_features;       /* incompatible features to old 
> >>>>>>>> kernel */
> >>>>>>>> +    __u8 reserved[302];             /* valid reserved region */
> >>>>>>>>      __le32 crc;                     /* checksum of superblock */
> >>>>>>>>  } __packed;
> >>>>>>>>  
> >>>>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>>>> 2.22.0
> >>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> > .
> > 

Reply via email to