On 08/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/8/16 11:03, Chao Yu wrote:
> > There is one case can cause data corruption.
> >
> > - write 4k to fileA
> > - fsync fileA, 4k data is writebacked to lbaA
> > - write 4k to fileA
> > - kworker flushs 4k to lbaB; dnode contain lbaB didn't be persisted yet
> > - write 4k to fileB
> > - kworker flush 4k to lbaA due to SSR
> > - SPOR -> dnode with lbaA will be recovered, however lbaA contains fileB's
> > data
> >
> > One solution is tracking all fsynced file's block history, and disallow
> > SSR overwrite on newly invalidated block on that file.
> >
> > However, during recovery, no matter the dnode is flushed or fsynced, all
> > previous dnodes until last fsynced one in node chain can be recovered,
> > that means we need to record all block change in flushed dnode, which
> > will cause heavy cost, so let's just use simple fix by forbidding SSR
> > overwrite directly.
> >
>
> Jaegeuk,
>
> Please help to add below missed tag to keep this patch being merged in stable
> kernel.
>
> Fixes: 5b6c6be2d878 ("f2fs: use SSR for warm node as well")
Done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 9d9d9a050d59..69b3b553ee6b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -2205,9 +2205,11 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info
> > *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> > if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->discard_map))
> > sbi->discard_blks--;
> >
> > - /* don't overwrite by SSR to keep node chain */
> > - if (IS_NODESEG(se->type) &&
> > - !is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
> > + /*
> > + * SSR should never reuse block which is checkpointed
> > + * or newly invalidated.
> > + */
> > + if (!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED)) {
> > if (!f2fs_test_and_set_bit(offset, se->ckpt_valid_map))
> > se->ckpt_valid_blocks++;
> > }
> >
