On Dec 09, 2019 / 10:04, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/12/2 17:40, Shin'ichiro Kawasaki wrote:
> > To catch f2fs bugs in write pointer handling code for zoned block
> > devices, check write pointers of non-open zones that current segments do
> > not point to. Do this check at mount time, after the fsync data recovery
> > and current segments' write pointer consistency fix. Or when fsync data
> > recovery is disabled by mount option, do the check when there is no fsync
> > data.
> > 
> > Check two items comparing write pointers with valid block maps in SIT.
> > The first item is check for zones with no valid blocks. When there is no
> > valid blocks in a zone, the write pointer should be at the start of the
> > zone. If not, next write operation to the zone will cause unaligned write
> > error. If write pointer is not at the zone start, reset the write pointer
> > to place at the zone start.
> > 
> > The second item is check between the write pointer position and the last
> > valid block in the zone. It is unexpected that the last valid block
> > position is beyond the write pointer. In such a case, report as a bug.
> > Fix is not required for such zone, because the zone is not selected for
> > next write operation until the zone get discarded.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |   1 +
> >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/f2fs/super.c   |  11 ++++
> >  3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > index 002c417b0a53..23a84d7f17b8 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > @@ -3156,6 +3156,7 @@ int f2fs_lookup_journal_in_cursum(struct f2fs_journal 
> > *journal, int type,
> >                     unsigned int val, int alloc);
> >  void f2fs_flush_sit_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control 
> > *cpc);
> >  int f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > +int f2fs_check_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >  int f2fs_build_segment_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >  void f2fs_destroy_segment_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> >  int __init f2fs_create_segment_manager_caches(void);
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 9b6c7ab67b93..48903b7a9d25 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -4370,6 +4370,90 @@ static int sanity_check_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> > *sbi)
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
> >  
> > +static int check_zone_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > +                               struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev,
> > +                               struct blk_zone *zone)
> > +{
> > +   unsigned int wp_segno, wp_blkoff, zone_secno, zone_segno, segno;
> > +   block_t zone_block, wp_block, last_valid_block;
> > +   unsigned int log_sectors_per_block = sbi->log_blocksize - SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > +   int i, s, b, ret;
> > +   struct seg_entry *se;
> > +
> > +   if (zone->type != BLK_ZONE_TYPE_SEQWRITE_REQ)
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> > +   wp_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->wp >> log_sectors_per_block);
> > +   wp_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, wp_block);
> > +   wp_blkoff = wp_block - START_BLOCK(sbi, wp_segno);
> > +   zone_block = fdev->start_blk + (zone->start >> log_sectors_per_block);
> > +   zone_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, zone_block);
> > +   zone_secno = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, zone_segno);
> > +
> > +   if (zone_segno >= MAIN_SEGS(sbi))
> > +           return 0;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * Skip check of zones cursegs point to, since
> > +    * fix_curseg_write_pointer() checks them.
> > +    */
> > +   for (i = 0; i < NO_CHECK_TYPE; i++)
> > +           if (zone_secno == GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi,
> > +                                              CURSEG_I(sbi, i)->segno))
> > +                   return 0;
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * Get last valid block of the zone.
> > +    */
> > +   last_valid_block = zone_block - 1;
> > +   for (s = sbi->segs_per_sec - 1; s >= 0; s--) {
> > +           segno = zone_segno + s;
> > +           se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> > +           for (b = sbi->blocks_per_seg - 1; b >= 0; b--)
> > +                   if (f2fs_test_bit(b, se->cur_valid_map)) {
> > +                           last_valid_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, segno) + b;
> > +                           break;
> > +                   }
> > +           if (last_valid_block >= zone_block)
> > +                   break;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * If last valid block is beyond the write pointer, report the
> > +    * inconsistency. This inconsistency does not cause write error
> > +    * because the zone will not be selected for write operation until
> > +    * it get discarded. Just report it.
> > +    */
> > +   if (last_valid_block >= wp_block) {
> > +           f2fs_notice(sbi, "Valid block beyond write pointer: "
> > +                       "valid block[0x%x,0x%x] wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
> > +                       GET_SEGNO(sbi, last_valid_block),
> > +                       GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, last_valid_block),
> > +                       wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> > +           return 0;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * If there is no valid block in the zone and if write pointer is
> > +    * not at zone start, reset the write pointer.
> > +    */
> > +   if (last_valid_block + 1 == zone_block && zone->wp != zone->start) {
> > +           f2fs_notice(sbi,
> > +                       "Zone without valid block has non-zero write "
> > +                       "pointer. Reset the write pointer: wp[0x%x,0x%x]",
> > +                       wp_segno, wp_blkoff);
> > +           ret = blkdev_zone_mgmt(fdev->bdev, REQ_OP_ZONE_RESET,
> > +                                  zone->start, zone->len, GFP_NOFS);
> 
> Should use __f2fs_issue_discard_zone() to cover multi-device support?

Yes, __f2fs_issue_discard_zone() for each device adds more check and I think
it is safer for multi-device case. Will re-post the patch with you suggest.

> 
> > +           if (ret) {
> > +                   f2fs_notice(sbi, "Reset zone failed: %s (errno=%d)",
> > +                               fdev->path, ret);
> > +                   return ret;
> > +           }
> 
> Just out of curiosity, how long will RESET command take normally?

Though I don't have accurate numbers, it takes around 10 milliseconds to
complete one RESET command for one zone with my system. Assuming the number
of zones to discard here is small, I think the additional overhead is small
enough to ignore.

Thanks!

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct f2fs_dev_info *get_target_zoned_dev(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >                                               block_t zone_blkaddr)
> >  {
> > @@ -4442,6 +4526,10 @@ static int fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct 
> > f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
> >                 "curseg[0x%x,0x%x]", type, cs->segno, cs->next_blkoff);
> >     allocate_segment_by_default(sbi, type, true);
> >  
> > +   /* check consistency of the zone curseg pointed to */
> > +   if (check_zone_write_pointer(sbi, zbd, &zone))
> > +           return -EIO;
> > +
> >     /* check newly assigned zone */
> >     cs_section = GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, cs->segno);
> >     cs_zone_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, GET_SEG_FROM_SEC(sbi, cs_section));
> > @@ -4492,11 +4580,49 @@ int f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct 
> > f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +struct check_zone_write_pointer_args {
> > +   struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi;
> > +   struct f2fs_dev_info *fdev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int check_zone_write_pointer_cb(struct blk_zone *zone, unsigned int 
> > idx,
> > +                                 void *data) {
> > +   struct check_zone_write_pointer_args *args;
> > +   args = (struct check_zone_write_pointer_args *)data;
> > +
> > +   return check_zone_write_pointer(args->sbi, args->fdev, zone);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int f2fs_check_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > +{
> > +   int i, ret;
> > +   struct check_zone_write_pointer_args args;
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
> > +           if (!bdev_is_zoned(FDEV(i).bdev))
> > +                   continue;
> > +
> > +           args.sbi = sbi;
> > +           args.fdev = &FDEV(i);
> > +           ret = blkdev_report_zones(FDEV(i).bdev, 0, BLK_ALL_ZONES,
> > +                                     check_zone_write_pointer_cb, &args);
> > +           if (ret < 0)
> > +                   return ret;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> >  #else
> >  int f2fs_fix_curseg_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> >  {
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> > +
> > +int f2fs_check_write_pointer(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > +{
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  /*
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 5111e1ffe58a..755ad57c795b 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -3544,6 +3544,17 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, 
> > void *data, int silent)
> >                     goto free_meta;
> >             }
> >     }
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * If the f2fs is not readonly and fsync data recovery succeeds,
> > +    * check zoned block devices' write pointer consistency.
> > +    */
> > +   if (!err && !f2fs_readonly(sb) && f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi)) {
> > +           err = f2fs_check_write_pointer(sbi);
> > +           if (err)
> > +                   goto free_meta;
> > +   }
> > +
> >  reset_checkpoint:
> >     /* f2fs_recover_fsync_data() cleared this already */
> >     clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);
> > 

--
Best Regards,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki

_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to