On 12/11/2019 10:48 AM, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:20:01AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/namei.h b/include/linux/namei.h
index 7fe7b87..0fd9315 100644
--- a/include/linux/namei.h
+++ b/include/linux/namei.h
@@ -92,4 +92,14 @@ retry_estale(const long error, const unsigned int flags)
        return error == -ESTALE && !(flags & LOOKUP_REVAL);
  }
+static inline bool is_dot_or_dotdot(const unsigned char *name, size_t len)
+{
+       if (unlikely(name[0] == '.')) {
+               if (len == 1 || (len == 2 && name[1] == '.'))
+                       return true;
+       }
+
+       return false;
+}
+
  #endif /* _LINUX_NAMEI_H */
I had suggested adding a len >= 1 check to handle the empty name case correctly.
What I had in mind was

static inline bool is_dot_or_dotdot(const unsigned char *name, size_t len)
{
        if (len >= 1 && unlikely(name[0] == '.')) {
                if (len < 2 || (len == 2 && name[1] == '.'))
                        return true;
        }

        return false;
}

As is, you're proposing that it always dereference the first byte even when
len=0, which seems like a bad idea for a shared helper function.  Did you check
whether it's okay for all the existing callers?  fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr() is
called from 6 places, did you check all of them?

How about keeping the existing optimized code for the hot path in fs/namei.c
(i.e. not using the helper function), while having the helper function do the
extra check to handle len=0 correctly?

Hi Eric,

Thank you for reminding me.  How about using the following helper for
all callers?

static inline bool is_dot_or_dotdot(const unsigned char *name, size_t len)
{
        if (len == 1 && name[0] == '.')
                return true;

        if (len == 2 && name[0] == '.' && name[1] == '.')
                return true;

        return false;
}

Hi Matthew,

How do you think? I think the performance influence is very small
due to is_dot_or_dotdot() is a such short static inline function.

Thanks,

Tiezhu Yang


- Eric



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to