On 2020/7/1 9:59, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/7/1 4:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 06/30, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 01:27:20PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> If two readahead threads having same offset enter in readpages, every read
>>>> IOs are split and issued to the disk which giving lower bandwidth.
>>>>
>>>> This patch tries to avoid redundant readahead calls.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaeg...@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> v3:
>>>>  - use READ|WRITE_ONCE
>>>> v2:
>>>>   - add missing code to bypass read
>>>>  
>>>>  fs/f2fs/data.c  | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  |  1 +
>>>>  fs/f2fs/super.c |  2 ++
>>>>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>>> index 995cf78b23c5e..360b4c9080d97 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>>> @@ -2296,6 +2296,7 @@ static int f2fs_mpage_readpages(struct inode *inode,
>>>>    unsigned nr_pages = rac ? readahead_count(rac) : 1;
>>>>    unsigned max_nr_pages = nr_pages;
>>>>    int ret = 0;
>>>> +  bool drop_ra = false;
>>>>  
>>>>    map.m_pblk = 0;
>>>>    map.m_lblk = 0;
>>>> @@ -2306,10 +2307,24 @@ static int f2fs_mpage_readpages(struct inode 
>>>> *inode,
>>>>    map.m_seg_type = NO_CHECK_TYPE;
>>>>    map.m_may_create = false;
>>>>  
>>>> +  /*
>>>> +   * Two readahead threads for same address range can cause race condition
>>>> +   * which fragments sequential read IOs. So let's avoid each other.
>>>> +   */
>>>> +  if (rac && readahead_count(rac)) {
>>>> +          if (READ_ONCE(F2FS_I(inode)->ra_offset) == readahead_index(rac))
>>>> +                  drop_ra = true;
>>>> +          else
>>>> +                  WRITE_ONCE(F2FS_I(inode)->ra_offset,
>>>> +                                          readahead_index(rac));
>>>> +  }
>>>> +
>>>>    for (; nr_pages; nr_pages--) {
>>>>            if (rac) {
>>>>                    page = readahead_page(rac);
>>>>                    prefetchw(&page->flags);
>>>> +                  if (drop_ra)
>>>> +                          goto next_page;
>>>
>>> When CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION is not set (i.e. x86_64 defconfig +
>>> CONFIG_F2FS_FS=y):
>>>
>>> $ make -skj"$(nproc)" O=out distclean defconfig fs/f2fs/data.o
>>> ../fs/f2fs/data.c: In function ‘f2fs_mpage_readpages’:
>>> ../fs/f2fs/data.c:2327:5: error: label ‘next_page’ used but not defined
>>>  2327 |     goto next_page;
>>>       |     ^~~~
>>> ...
>>
>> Thanks. I pushed the fix for -next.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/1be18397-7fc6-703e-121b-e210e1013...@infradead.org/T/#t

It will hang the kernel because we missed to unlock those cached pages,
I changed to 'goto set_error_page', the issue was gone.

Thanks,

> 
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> 


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to