On 09/28, Chao Yu wrote: > In f2fs_file_write_iter(), let's use f2fs_overwrite_io() to > check whethere it is overwrite case, for such case, we can skip > f2fs_preallocate_blocks() in order to avoid f2fs_do_map_lock(), > which may be blocked by checkpoint() potentially. > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org> > --- > fs/f2fs/file.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c > index 13deae03df06..51fecb2f4db5 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c > @@ -4321,6 +4321,10 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb > *iocb, struct iov_iter *from) > preallocated = true; > target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from); > > + if (f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, iocb->ki_pos, > + iov_iter_count(from))) > + goto write;
This calls f2fs_map_blocks() which can be duplicate, if it's not the overwirte case. Do we have other benefit? > + > err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from); > if (err) { > out_err: > -- > 2.32.0 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel