On 09/28, Chao Yu wrote:
> In f2fs_file_write_iter(), let's use f2fs_overwrite_io() to
> check whethere it is overwrite case, for such case, we can skip
> f2fs_preallocate_blocks() in order to avoid f2fs_do_map_lock(),
> which may be blocked by checkpoint() potentially.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 13deae03df06..51fecb2f4db5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -4321,6 +4321,10 @@ static ssize_t f2fs_file_write_iter(struct kiocb 
> *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>               preallocated = true;
>               target_size = iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from);
>  
> +             if (f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, iocb->ki_pos,
> +                                             iov_iter_count(from)))
> +                     goto write;

This calls f2fs_map_blocks() which can be duplicate, if it's not the overwirte
case. Do we have other benefit?

> +
>               err = f2fs_preallocate_blocks(iocb, from);
>               if (err) {
>  out_err:
> -- 
> 2.32.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to