On 08/01, studentxs...@163.com wrote: > From: Xie Shaowen <studentxs...@163.com> > > replace kmalloc with f2fs_kmalloc to keep f2fs code consistency. > > Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashro...@santino.com> > Signed-off-by: Xie Shaowen <studentxs...@163.com> > --- > fs/f2fs/dir.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/dir.c b/fs/f2fs/dir.c > index d5bd7932fb64..712b51f69c04 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/dir.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/dir.c > @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static int f2fs_match_ci_name(const struct inode *dir, > const struct qstr *name, > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fscrypt_has_encryption_key(dir))) > return -EINVAL; > > - decrypted_name.name = kmalloc(de_name_len, GFP_KERNEL); > + decrypted_name.name = f2fs_kmalloc(de_name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
Please fix the build breakage. fyi; static inline void *f2fs_kmalloc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, size_t size, gfp_t flags) > if (!decrypted_name.name) > return -ENOMEM; > res = fscrypt_fname_disk_to_usr(dir, 0, 0, &encrypted_name, > -- > 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
