On 2023/2/15 10:48, Yonggil Song wrote:
When f2fs skipped a gc round during victim migration, there was a bug which
would skip all upcoming gc rounds unconditionally because skipped_gc_rwsem
was not initialized. It fixes the bug by correctly initializing the
skipped_gc_rwsem inside the gc loop.
It makes sense to me.
Fixes: d147ea4adb96 ("f2fs: introduce f2fs_gc_control to consolidate f2fs_gc
parameters")
How does this commits introduce the bug?
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Yonggil Song <yonggil.s...@samsung.com>
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index b22f49a6f128..81d326abaac1 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -1786,8 +1786,8 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct
f2fs_gc_control *gc_control)
prefree_segments(sbi));
cpc.reason = __get_cp_reason(sbi);
- sbi->skipped_gc_rwsem = 0;
gc_more:
+ sbi->skipped_gc_rwsem = 0;
if (unlikely(!(sbi->sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE))) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto stop;
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
