On Thu, 2023-02-16 at 11:57 +0900, Yonggil Song wrote:
> When f2fs skipped a gc round during victim migration, there was a bug
> which
> would skip all upcoming gc rounds unconditionally because
> skipped_gc_rwsem
> was not initialized. It fixes the bug by correctly initializing the
> skipped_gc_rwsem inside the gc loop.
>
> Fixes: 3db1de0e582c ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way")
> Signed-off-by: Yonggil Song <yonggil.s...@samsung.com>
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> index b22f49a6f128..81d326abaac1 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,8 @@ int f2fs_gc(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct
> f2fs_gc_control *gc_control)
> prefree_segments(sbi));
>
> cpc.reason = __get_cp_reason(sbi);
> - sbi->skipped_gc_rwsem = 0;
> gc_more:
> + sbi->skipped_gc_rwsem = 0;
> if (unlikely(!(sbi->sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE))) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto stop;
Might want to Cc the stable mailing list.
--
~miko
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
