In __replace_atomic_write_block(), we missed to check return value of inc_valid_block_count(), for extreme testcase that f2fs image is run out of space, it may cause inconsistent status in between SIT table and total valid block count.
Cc: Daeho Jeong <[email protected]> Fixes: 3db1de0e582c ("f2fs: change the current atomic write way") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index fc0734e4fb92..17203e8b865a 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -246,10 +246,16 @@ static int __replace_atomic_write_block(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, } else { blkcnt_t count = 1; + err = inc_valid_block_count(sbi, inode, &count); + if (err) { + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn); + return err; + } + *old_addr = dn.data_blkaddr; f2fs_truncate_data_blocks_range(&dn, 1); dec_valid_block_count(sbi, F2FS_I(inode)->cow_inode, count); - inc_valid_block_count(sbi, inode, &count); + f2fs_replace_block(sbi, &dn, dn.data_blkaddr, new_addr, ni.version, true, false); } -- 2.36.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
