On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 09:01:41AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2023/5/27 1:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/24, Wu Bo wrote:
> > > The NULL return of 'd_splice_alias' dosen't mean error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo...@vivo.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/namei.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > > index 77a71276ecb1..e5a3e39ce90c 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c
> > > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static struct dentry *f2fs_lookup(struct inode *dir,
> > > struct dentry *dentry,
> > > #endif
> > > new = c(inode, dentry);
> > > err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new);
> > > - trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, dentry, ino, !new ? -ENOENT : err);
> > > + trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, new ? new : dentry, ino, err);
> >
> > Shouldn't give an error pointer to the dentry field.
> >
> > How about just giving the err?
> >
> > - err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new);
> > - trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, dentry, ino, !new ? -ENOENT : err);
> > + trace_f2fs_lookup_end(dir, dentry, ino, PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new));
>
> static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr)
> {
> if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> return PTR_ERR(ptr);
> else
> return 0;
> }
>
> For below two cases, PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(new) will return zero:
> a) f2fs_lookup found existed dentry
> b) f2fs_lookup didn't find existed dentry (-ENOENT case)
>
> So in below commit, I passed -ENOENT to tracepoint for case b), so we can
> distinguish result of f2fs_lookup in tracepoint, actually, -ENOENT is expected
> value when we create a new file/directory.
>
> Commit 84597b1f9b05 ("f2fs: fix wrong value of tracepoint parameter")
I can see this commit is try to distinguish the dentry not existed case.
But a normal case which dentry is exactly found will also go through
'd_splice_alias', and its return is also NULL. This makes the tracepoint always
print 'err:-2' like the following:
ls-11676 [004] .... 329281.943118: f2fs_lookup_end: dev = (254,39),
pino = 4451, name:Alarms, ino:7093, err:-2
ls-11676 [004] .... 329281.943145: f2fs_lookup_end: dev = (254,39),
pino = 4451, name:Notifications, ino:7094, err:-2
ls-11676 [004] .... 329281.943172: f2fs_lookup_end: dev = (254,39),
pino = 4451, name:Pictures, ino:7095, err:-2
Even these lookup are acctually successful, this is a bit strange.
>
> >
> >
> > > return new;
> > > out_iput:
> > > iput(inode);
> > > --
> > > 2.35.3
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
