All dentries in a case-insensitive filesystem have the same set of
dentry operations.  Therefore, we should let VFS propagate them from
sb->s_d_op d_alloc instead of setting at lookup time.

This was already the case before commit bb9cd9106b22 ("fscrypt: Have
filesystems handle their d_ops"), but it was changed to set at
lookup-time to facilitate the integration with fscrypt.  But it's a
problem because dentries that don't get created through ->lookup() won't
have any visibility of the operations.  Let's revert to the previous
implementation.

Suggested-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <kris...@suse.de>
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c | 6 +++++-
 fs/ext4/super.c | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
index d252935f9c8a..3c1208d5d85b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -1762,7 +1762,11 @@ static struct buffer_head *ext4_lookup_entry(struct 
inode *dir,
        struct buffer_head *bh;
 
        err = ext4_fname_prepare_lookup(dir, dentry, &fname);
-       generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops(dentry);
+
+       /* Case-insensitive volumes set dentry ops through sb->s_d_op. */
+       if (!dir->i_sb->s_encoding)
+               generic_set_encrypted_ci_d_ops(dentry);
+
        if (err == -ENOENT)
                return NULL;
        if (err)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index c5fcf377ab1f..5ac1c9df9956 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5493,6 +5493,9 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, 
struct super_block *sb)
                goto failed_mount4;
        }
 
+       if (sb->s_encoding)
+               sb->s_d_op = &generic_ci_dentry_ops;
+
        sb->s_root = d_make_root(root);
        if (!sb->s_root) {
                ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "get root dentry failed");
-- 
2.43.0



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to