On 2024/5/15 0:07, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
外部邮件/External Mail
On 05/11, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2024/5/11 8:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/10, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2024/5/10 11:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/10, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2024/5/9 23:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote:
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inline.c:258!
CPU: 1 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Not tainted
6.9.0-rc6-syzkaller-00012-g9e4bc4bcae01 #0
RIP: 0010:f2fs_write_inline_data+0x781/0x790 fs/f2fs/inline.c:258
Call Trace:
f2fs_write_single_data_page+0xb65/0x1d60 fs/f2fs/data.c:2834
f2fs_write_cache_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3133 [inline]
__f2fs_write_data_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3288 [inline]
f2fs_write_data_pages+0x1efe/0x3a90 fs/f2fs/data.c:3315
do_writepages+0x35b/0x870 mm/page-writeback.c:2612
__writeback_single_inode+0x165/0x10b0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1650
writeback_sb_inodes+0x905/0x1260 fs/fs-writeback.c:1941
wb_writeback+0x457/0xce0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2117
wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2264 [inline]
wb_workfn+0x410/0x1090 fs/fs-writeback.c:2304
process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3254 [inline]
process_scheduled_works+0xa12/0x17c0 kernel/workqueue.c:3335
worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3416
kthread+0x2f2/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
The root cause is: inline_data inode can be fuzzed, so that there may
be valid blkaddr in its direct node, once f2fs triggers background GC
to migrate the block, it will hit f2fs_bug_on() during dirty page
writeback.
Let's add sanity check on i_nid field for inline_data inode, meanwhile,
forbid to migrate inline_data inode's data block to fix this issue.
Reported-by: syzbot+848062ba19c8782ca...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/000000000000d103ce06174d7...@google.com
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <c...@kernel.org>
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 +-
fs/f2fs/gc.c | 6 ++++++
fs/f2fs/inline.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
index fced2b7652f4..c876813b5532 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
+++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
@@ -4146,7 +4146,7 @@ extern struct kmem_cache *f2fs_inode_entry_slab;
* inline.c
*/
bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
-bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode);
+bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *ipage);
bool f2fs_may_inline_dentry(struct inode *inode);
void f2fs_do_read_inline_data(struct page *page, struct page *ipage);
void f2fs_truncate_inline_inode(struct inode *inode,
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
index e86c7f01539a..041957750478 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
@@ -1563,6 +1563,12 @@ static int gc_data_segment(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
struct f2fs_summary *sum,
continue;
}
+ if (f2fs_has_inline_data(inode)) {
+ iput(inode);
+ set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
+ continue;
Any race condtion to get this as false alarm?
Since there is no reproducer for the bug, I doubt it was caused by metadata
fuzzing, something like this:
- inline inode has one valid blkaddr in i_addr or in dnode reference by i_nid;
- SIT/SSA entry of the block is valid;
- background GC migrates the block;
- kworker writeback it, and trigger the bug_on().
Wasn't detected by sanity_check_inode?
I fuzzed non-inline inode w/ below metadata fields:
- i_blocks = 1
- i_size = 2048
- i_inline |= 0x02
sanity_check_inode() doesn't complain.
I mean, the below sanity_check_inode() can cover the fuzzed case? I'm wondering
I didn't figure out a generic way in sanity_check_inode() to catch all fuzzed
cases.
The patch described:
"The root cause is: inline_data inode can be fuzzed, so that there may
be valid blkaddr in its direct node, once f2fs triggers background GC
to migrate the block, it will hit f2fs_bug_on() during dirty page
writeback."
Do you suspect the node block address was suddenly assigned after f2fs_iget()?
No, I suspect that the image was fuzzed by tools offline, not in runtime after
mount().
Otherwise, it looks checking them in sanity_check_inode would be enough.
e.g.
case #1
- blkaddr, its dnode, SSA and SIT are consistent
- dnode.footer.ino points to inline inode
- inline inode doesn't link to the donde
Something like fuzzed special file, please check details in below commit:
9056d6489f5a ("f2fs: fix to do sanity check on inode type during garbage
collection")
case #2
- blkaddr, its dnode, SSA and SIT are consistent
- blkaddr locates in inline inode's i_addr
The image status is something like above as I described.
Thanks,
Thanks,
whether we really need to check it in the gc path.
Thanks,
Thoughts?
Thanks,
+ }
+
err = f2fs_gc_pinned_control(inode, gc_type, segno);
if (err == -EAGAIN) {
iput(inode);
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inline.c b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
index ac00423f117b..067600fed3d4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inline.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inline.c
@@ -33,11 +33,26 @@ bool f2fs_may_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
return !f2fs_post_read_required(inode);
}
-bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode)
+static bool has_node_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct page *ipage)
+{
+ struct f2fs_inode *ri = F2FS_INODE(ipage);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < DEF_NIDS_PER_INODE; i++) {
+ if (ri->i_nid[i])
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+bool f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(struct inode *inode, struct page *ipage)
{
if (!f2fs_has_inline_data(inode))
return false;
+ if (has_node_blocks(inode, ipage))
+ return false;
+
if (!support_inline_data(inode))
return true;
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
index c26effdce9aa..1423cd27a477 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static bool sanity_check_inode(struct inode *inode, struct
page *node_page)
}
}
- if (f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(inode)) {
+ if (f2fs_sanity_check_inline_data(inode, node_page)) {
f2fs_warn(sbi, "%s: inode (ino=%lx, mode=%u) should not have
inline_data, run fsck to fix",
__func__, inode->i_ino, inode->i_mode);
return false;
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
