On 7/22/2024 9:28 AM, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2024/7/20 18:33, Yongpeng Yang wrote:
In the init_victim_secmap function, if the allocation of
dirty_i->pinned_secmap fails, dirty_i->victim_secmap is not
freed, which can cause a memory leak.

Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpe...@oppo.com>
---
  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 78c3198a6308..1e784ea3dbb4 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -4971,8 +4971,10 @@ static int init_victim_secmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
          return -ENOMEM;
      dirty_i->pinned_secmap = f2fs_kvzalloc(sbi, bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
-    if (!dirty_i->pinned_secmap)
+    if (!dirty_i->pinned_secmap) {
+        kvfree(dirty_i->victim_secmap);

Yongpeng,

In below path, it will release pinned_secmap/victim_secmap?

- f2fs_destroy_segment_manager
  - destroy_victim_secmap
   : kvfree(dirty_i->pinned_secmap);
   : kvfree(dirty_i->victim_secmap);

Thanks,
Oh, I missed the error handler of f2fs_build_segment_manager, which will free valid pointer and ignore NULL pointer. Just get rid of this patch.

          return -ENOMEM;
+    }
      dirty_i->pinned_secmap_cnt = 0;
      dirty_i->enable_pin_section = true;


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to