On 6/11/25 17:22, Chao Yu wrote:
On 6/10/25 20:37, Sheng Yong wrote:
From: Sheng Yong <shengyo...@xiaomi.com>

In some scenario, such as autotest, it is not expected to answer
question from fsck or dump. To simply answer no to all these questions,
this patch adds an option `N' to do that.

Signed-off-by: Sheng Yong <shengyo...@xiaomi.com>
---
[...]
diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
index c5d41597934a..b01a22c8cf53 100644
--- a/fsck/main.c
+++ b/fsck/main.c
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ void fsck_usage()
        MSG(0, "  -t show directory tree\n");
        MSG(0, "  -q preserve quota limits\n");
        MSG(0, "  -y fix all the time\n");
+       MSG(0, "  -N answer \"No\" for all questions\n");
        MSG(0, "  -V print the version number and exit\n");
        MSG(0, "  --dry-run do not really fix corruptions\n");
        MSG(0, "  --no-kernel-check skips detecting kernel change\n");
@@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ void dump_usage()
        MSG(0, "  -f do not prompt before dumping\n");
        MSG(0, "  -H support write hint\n");
        MSG(0, "  -y alias for -f\n");
+       MSG(0, "  -N answer \"No\" for all questions\n");
        MSG(0, "  -o dump inodes to the given path\n");
        MSG(0, "  -P preserve mode/owner/group for dumped inode\n");
        MSG(0, "  -L Preserves symlinks. Otherwise symlinks are dumped as regular 
files.\n");

It needs to update manual of fsck.f2fs and dump.f2fs as well?

Hi, Chao,

Yes, manual should be updated. I'll add the description in the next version.

Thanks,
shengyong

Thanks,

[...]




_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to