> On 6/12/25 11:27, wangzijie wrote:
> > Wu Bo once mentioned a fallocate fail scenario in this link[1].
> > After commit 3fdd89b452c2("f2fs: prevent writing without fallocate()
> > for pinned files"), we cannot directly generate 4K size file and
> > pin it, but we can still generate non-segment aligned pinned file:
> > 
> > touch test_file
> > ./f2fs_io pinfile set test_file
> > ./f2fs_io fallocate 0 0 8192 test_file
> > truncate -s 4096 test_file
> 
> Well, shouldn't we avoid such case by adding check condition in setattr?

Maybe like this?  

---
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 6bd3de64f..2f6537d9c 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -1027,6 +1027,8 @@ int f2fs_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry 
*dentry,
        struct inode *inode = d_inode(dentry);
        struct f2fs_inode_info *fi = F2FS_I(inode);
        int err;
+       struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
+       block_t sec_blks = CAP_BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi);
 
        if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(F2FS_I_SB(inode))))
                return -EIO;
@@ -1047,6 +1049,11 @@ int f2fs_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry 
*dentry,
                        !IS_ALIGNED(attr->ia_size,
                        F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(fi->i_cluster_size)))
                        return -EINVAL;
+               if (f2fs_is_pinned_file(inode) &&
+                       attr->ia_size < i_size_read(inode) &&
+                       !IS_ALIGNED(attr->ia_size,
+                       F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(sec_blks)));
+                       return -EINVAL;
        }
 
        err = setattr_prepare(idmap, dentry, attr);
---

> > 
> > By doing this, pin+fallocate failure(gc happens EAGAIN but f2fs shows
> > enough spare space) may occurs.
> > 
> > From message in commit 2e42b7f817ac("f2fs: stop allocating pinned sections
> > if EAGAIN happens"), gc EAGAIN doesn't guarantee a free section, so we stop
> > allocating. But after commit 48ea8b200414 ("f2fs: fix to avoid panic once 
> > fallocation fails for pinfile"), we have a way to avoid panic caused by
> > concurrent pinfile allocation run out of free section, so I think that we 
> > can continue to allocate pinned section when gc happens EAGAIN. Even if we
> > don't have free section, f2fs_allocate_pinning_section() can fail with 
> > ENOSPC.
> 
> What do you think of introduce /sys/fs/f2fs/<dev>/reserved_pin_section to
> tune @needed parameter of has_not_enough_free_secs()? If we configure it
> w/ zero, it can avoid f2fs_gc() before preallocation.
> 
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  | 3 +++
>  fs/f2fs/file.c  | 5 ++---
>  fs/f2fs/super.c | 3 +++
>  fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 9 +++++++++
>  4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 785537576aa8..ffb15da570d7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -1731,6 +1731,9 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>       /* for skip statistic */
>       unsigned long long skipped_gc_rwsem;            /* FG_GC only */
> 
> +     /* free sections reserved for pinned file */
> +     unsigned int reserved_pin_section;
> +
>       /* threshold for gc trials on pinned files */
>       unsigned short gc_pin_file_threshold;
>       struct f2fs_rwsem pin_sem;
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index 696131e655ed..a909f79db178 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1887,9 +1887,8 @@ static int f2fs_expand_inode_data(struct inode *inode, 
> loff_t offset,
>                       }
>               }
> 
> -             if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ?
> -                     ZONED_PIN_SEC_REQUIRED_COUNT :
> -                     GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, overprovision_segments(sbi)))) {
> +             if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0,
> +                             sbi->reserved_pin_section)) {
>                       f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
>                       stat_inc_gc_call_count(sbi, FOREGROUND);
>                       err = f2fs_gc(sbi, &gc_control);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index 57adeff5ef25..48b97a95fd63 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -4975,6 +4975,9 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, 
> struct fs_context *fc)
>       sbi->last_valid_block_count = sbi->total_valid_block_count;
>       sbi->reserved_blocks = 0;
>       sbi->current_reserved_blocks = 0;
> +     sbi->reserved_pin_section = f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) ?
> +                     ZONED_PIN_SEC_REQUIRED_COUNT :
> +                     GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, overprovision_segments(sbi));
>       limit_reserve_root(sbi);
>       adjust_unusable_cap_perc(sbi);
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> index 75134d69a0bd..51be7ffb38c5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,13 @@ static ssize_t __sbi_store(struct f2fs_attr *a,
>               return count;
>       }
> 
> +     if (!strcmp(a->attr.name, "reserved_pin_section")) {
> +             if (t > GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, overprovision_segments(sbi)))
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             *ui = (unsigned int)t;
> +             return count;
> +     }
> +
>       *ui = (unsigned int)t;
> 
>       return count;
> @@ -1130,6 +1137,7 @@ F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RO_ATTR(unusable_blocks_per_sec);
>  F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(blkzone_alloc_policy);
>  #endif
>  F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(carve_out);
> +F2FS_SBI_GENERAL_RW_ATTR(reserved_pin_section);
> 
>  /* STAT_INFO ATTR */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_STAT_FS
> @@ -1323,6 +1331,7 @@ static struct attribute *f2fs_attrs[] = {
>       ATTR_LIST(last_age_weight),
>       ATTR_LIST(max_read_extent_count),
>       ATTR_LIST(carve_out),
> +     ATTR_LIST(reserved_pin_section),
>       NULL,
>  };
>  ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(f2fs);
> -- 
> 2.49.0

I think it's a good way to solve this problem. Thank you!


> > 
> > [1] 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20231030094024.263707-1-bo...@vivo.com/t/#u
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzij...@honor.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/f2fs/file.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > index 6bd3de64f..05c80d2b5 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> > @@ -1859,7 +1859,7 @@ static int f2fs_expand_inode_data(struct inode 
> > *inode, loff_t offset,
> >                     f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
> >                     stat_inc_gc_call_count(sbi, FOREGROUND);
> >                     err = f2fs_gc(sbi, &gc_control);
> > -                   if (err && err != -ENODATA) {
> > +                   if (err && err != -ENODATA && err != -EAGAIN) {
> >                             f2fs_up_write(&sbi->pin_sem);
> >                             goto out_err;
> >                     }
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel



_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

Reply via email to