On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 09:55:14AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > I think letting filesystems implement their own holder ops should be > avoided if we can. Christoph may chime in here.
Ccing helps for that.. > > I have no appettite for > exporting stuff like get_bdev_super() unless absolutely necessary. We > tried to move all that handling into the VFS to eliminate a slew of > deadlocks we detected and fixed. I have no appetite to repeat that > cycle. Exactly. > The shutdown method is implemented only by block-based filesystems and > arguably shutdown was always a misnomer because it assumed that the > filesystem needs to actually shut down when it is called. IOW, we made > it so that it is a call to action but that doesn't have to be the case. > Calling it ->remove_bdev() is imo the correct thing because it gives > block based filesystem the ability to handle device events how they see > fit. > > Once we will have non-block based filesystems that need a method to > always shut down the filesystem itself we might have to revisit this > design anyway but no one had that use-case yet. I'm not sure what non-block file systems would need it for except maybe for a generic IOC_SHUTDOWN implementation, but that would have a different signature anyway as it needs to pass flags that don't fit here. So that would be a separate method. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
