Hi Jan,
On 2025/7/21 18:25, Jan Kara wrote:
On Mon 21-07-25 11:14:02, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Barry,
On 2025/7/21 09:02, Barry Song wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 8:28 AM Gao Xiang <hsiang...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
...
... high-order folios can cause side effects on embedded devices
like routers and IoT devices, which still have MiBs of memory (and I
believe this won't change due to their use cases) but they also use
Linux kernel for quite long time. In short, I don't think enabling
large folios for those devices is very useful, let alone limiting
the minimum folio order for them (It would make the filesystem not
suitable any more for those users. At least that is what I never
want to do). And I believe this is different from the current LBS
support to match hardware characteristics or LBS atomic write
requirement.
Given the difficulty of allocating large folios, it's always a good
idea to have order-0 as a fallback. While I agree with your point,
I have a slightly different perspective — enabling large folios for
those devices might be beneficial, but the maximum order should
remain small. I'm referring to "small" large folios.
Yeah, agreed. Having a way to limit the maximum order for those small
devices (rather than disabling it completely) would be helpful. At
least "small" large folios could still provide benefits when memory
pressure is light.
Well, in the page cache you can tune not only the minimum but also the
maximum order of a folio being allocated for each inode. Btrfs and ext4
already use this functionality. So in principle the functionality is there,
it is "just" a question of proper user interfaces or automatic logic to
tune this limit.
Yes, I took a quick glance of the current ext4 and btrfs cases
weeks ago which use this to fulfill the journal reservation
for example.
but considering that specific memory overhead use cases (to
limit maximum large folio order for small devices), it sounds
more like a generic page cache user interface for all
filesystems instead, and in the effective maximum order should
combine these two maximum numbers.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Honza
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
