> Hi, > > On Monday 10 July 2006 13:12, Henning Sprang wrote: > > Things for which the rules in Debian are set for etch should really be > > fixed as soon as possible - if there's a final decision in Debian for > > which FHS version to go, then the bug should be handled. > > As written in my mail which started this thread, Debian has changed the > policy > to mandate FHS 2.3. Thats the latest FHS version, so it's final. > Nice to know, however, ...
> > Also, I dont see how changing the default setting of a configuration variable > effects any existing installation, you need to modify fai.conf to use it, and > modified config files are not touched on upgrades. > even though I agree that this should not cause any harm, there might be some unexpected side effects. Thus I urge for the modified package being tested before it gets uploaded to unstable, and I'd suggest we do the testing at Linuxhotel. Best, Michael
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
