Hi, [...] > After reading just the changelog I doubt they let it in :-) (But do try!) > > But, two of the closed important bugs (from the bts) still seem worthwhile > fixing in stable... (offline atm, so I cannot look up the numbers.) >
I've only now reviewed the changelog myself and indeed the number of changes is pretty large with clearly not all of them being important or serious bugs, let alone them being reported to the Debian BTS as such. Yet still almost all changes are bugfixes, only get-config-dir-http and the align-at stuff in setup-storage are new features. But then again the former is non-intrusive (it won't change anything for setups not using http) and the align-at is important for current hardware to ensure efficient operation. I think the main problem for the release team will be that the changes are so wide-spread that reviewing could be pretty painful, especially for people not into FAI. We should clearly warn the release team about that, I don't want to waste their time, let alone annoy them. We should be ready to gently lend them a hand and possibly talk them through the changes. Best regards, Michael
pgpgARbZQydF2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
