>>>>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:40:35 +0100, Matthias Lechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
> Thanks a lot! > that solved the problem! > but why does fai use this "kernel-image-2.4.27-1-386"-entry instead of "kernel-image-2.4-386", which would be much easier? This "meta" package did not exist for some time, so I had to use the other package name. But I will switch to the more generic name in a future release. -- regards Thomas