On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 01:21 -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > On 8/6/05, Henning Sprang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's in fact an interesting question if there is somebody alive and > > reading mail in debian-legal. Or do we need to prove that fai is a > > debian package? - dpkg/apt-cache should do that better than us. Or is it > > a subscribed-only list that doesn't tell use we're not subscribed, just > > stores the mails in /dev/null as long as we're not? > > We in debian-legal seem to be fully occupied with our regularly > scheduled flame-fest. I expect that everyone will be happiest if > FAIwiki content is dual-licensed GPL and > your-choice-of-attribute-me-harder-license unless marked otherwise. > Don't quote me on that, though; IANADD, IANAL, and currently I think a > sizable minority would disagree with me on that just out of spite.
Sorry for the not-so-nice way of me asking if you are alive there, and thanks very much for the reply. Actually, when I remember correctly the configuration of linux-fai (which is not in my responsibility), _this_ mail really got stored in /dev/null at uni-koeln.de somewhere, without anybody being noticed, and I will forward it therefore to the linux-fai list. So in case somebody from debian-legal had answered before, only to the list, we really might not have gotten it ( I just see this happened once in the archive, I will also forward the mail from Francesco Poli - http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00075.html to the list). I am very sorry for realizing only now how real my objection with the /dev/null thing was - only on the wrong side - when seeing that I get this mail only one time, while I should get it twice (list + personal), and that something like that (mails to /dev/null) happened a while ago when I posted to linux-fai from the wrong address. Henning
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part