Re: 64-bit inode numbers (was: glibc 2.1.96)

[Ulrich Drepper]

Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   We had this 64-bits-or-not discussion with Ulrich  back when 2.1 was
>   imminent, and he was utterly convinced that it is good to save space
>   at various LFS related structure fields.

The LFS data structures are fine.  Inform yourself before complaining.

The problem are the old data structures.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]