>IMO preemptive kernel patches are an
>exercise in masturbation (bad algorithm that can be preempted at any
point
>is still a bad algorithm and should be fixed, not hidden)
What does this mean? What is a preemptive kernel patch and what kind of
bad algorithm are you contemplating, and what does it mean to hide one?
You're apparently referring back to some well known argument, but I'm not
familiar with it myself.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
