On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 08:43 +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > > I thought we declared that the concurrent clear_inode() and read_inode() > > were a VFS bug, and fixed it? It's even fixed in 2.4 now isn't it? > > Is it? I must have missed this discussion. )-:
Wasn't that why we backported __wait_on_freeing_inode() to 2.4? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html