On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 08:43 +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > I thought we declared that the concurrent clear_inode() and read_inode()
> > were a VFS bug, and fixed it? It's even fixed in 2.4 now isn't it?
> 
> Is it?  I must have missed this discussion.  )-:

Wasn't that why we backported __wait_on_freeing_inode() to 2.4?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to