On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:14:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >                                                     buf, bytes);
> > > @@ -1935,10 +1922,9 @@ generic_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb
> > >                                           cur_iov, iov_offset, bytes);
> > >           flush_dcache_page(page);
> > >           status = a_ops->commit_write(file, page, offset, offset+bytes);
> > > -         if (status == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE) {
> > > -                 page_cache_release(page);
> > > -                 continue;
> > > -         }
> > > +         if (unlikely(status))
> > > +                 goto fs_write_aop_error;
> > > +
> > 
> > I don't think this is correct, see how status >= 0 is used a few lines
> > downwards. Perhaps something along the lines of an
> > is_positive_aop_return() to test on?
> 
> Hmm, if commit_write() will never return non error positive values then
> this and 8/10 look sane.

It's really ugly, but it looks like at least some filesystems do. So
I'll fix up this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to