On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 09:16:06AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> A little late since I sent some patches to akpm already, but I'm thinking
> that this might be the better way to go. Rather than trying to have the
> filesystems manage i_nlink, just make drop_inode for the filesystems be
> generic_delete_inode. It seems that some filesystems already do that, and it
> seems like that should do the right thing here too. This seems to be a little
> easier to follow than messing with i_nlink.
> 
> Does this seem reasonable? If so, I'll send this on to akpm and ask him to
> commit this rather than the original pipefs patch I sent.

Sounds good to me.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to