On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 22:03 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > >>>> I think this information would be a little easier to access if there
> > >>>> would be a single file per pid or thread containing something like:
> > >>>> 
> > >>>> handle flags   pos     path
> > >>>> 0      0100002 1234    /dev/pts/1
> > >>>> 1      0100004 5678    /tmp/output
> > >>>> etc.
> > >>> 
> > >>> That would not be a good idea, as not all users have the same 
> > >>> permissions
> > >>> for viewing this information.
> > 
> > Since /proc/$$/fd is S_IRWXU, only the user owning the process (plus
> > usually root) can view it. So making the single file you propose S_IRWXU
> > too should solve any security issue, should not it?
> > 
> > >I think the problem is not with permissions, but with scaling to large
> > >numbers of file descriptors.
> > 
> > Would not that be dealt accordingly with seq_file?
> 
> Yes, most likely it wouldn't be so bad either. But it _would_ be:
> 
>  a) more complex, this implementation reuses most of the  the /proc/fd code
>  b) less efficient for querying a single fd
> 
> So I prefer the current solution, but not very strongly.

I don't have a real strong opinion, but I wanted to throw that out as a
suggestion.  You're the one writing the code.

Thanks,
Shaggy
-- 
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to