On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:07:35PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Tuesday April 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> > If prepare_write fails with AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE, or if commit_write fails, 
> > then
> > we may have failed the write operation despite prepare_write having
> > instantiated blocks past i_size. Fix this, and consolidate the trimming into
> > one place.
> > 
> ..
> > @@ -2025,40 +2012,53 @@ generic_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb
> >                                             cur_iov, iov_offset, bytes);
> >             flush_dcache_page(page);
> >             status = a_ops->commit_write(file, page, offset, offset+bytes);
> > -           if (status == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE) {
> > -                   page_cache_release(page);
> > -                   continue;
> > +           if (unlikely(status < 0))
> > +                   goto fs_write_aop_error;
> > +           if (unlikely(copied != bytes)) {
> > +                   status = -EFAULT;
> > +                   goto fs_write_aop_error;
> >             }
> 
> It isn't clear to me that you are handling the case
>        status == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE
> here.  AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE is > 0 (0x80001 to be precise)

Yes, you are right there.


> Maybe ->commit_write cannot return AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE.  If that is
> true, then a comment to that effect (i.e. that the old code was wrong)
> in the change log might easy review. 
> 
> Or did I miss something?

Actually, it seems that the old ocfs2 code (in mainline, not -mm) can
return AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE from commit_write.

So that line should be changed to
+           if (unlikely(status < 0 || status == AOP_TRUNCATED_PAGE)) 

Although we get rid of it in a subsequent patch anyway.

Thanks,
Nick

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to