On Jul 5 2007 15:43, Dave Hansen wrote:

>@@ -1911,13 +1911,27 @@ asmlinkage long sys_mknodat(int dfd, con
>       error = do_path_lookup(dfd, tmp, LOOKUP_PARENT, &nd);
>       if (error)
>               goto out;
>+
>       dentry = lookup_create(&nd, 0);
>       error = PTR_ERR(dentry);
>+      if (error)
>+              goto out_unlock;
> 
>       if (!IS_POSIXACL(nd.dentry->d_inode))
>               mode &= ~current->fs->umask;
>-      if (!IS_ERR(dentry)) {
>-              switch (mode & S_IFMT) {
>+      if (S_ISDIR(mode)) {
>+              error = -EPERM;
>+              goto out_dput;

Hm, I wonder why mknod(,S_IFDIR,) returns -EPERM rather than -EINVAL like the
others? It is a bit misleading; EPERM usually means root could do it
somehow (unless the kernel is really pedantic).
IMHO this if(S_ISDIR) should go.

>+      if (!S_ISREG(mode)  && !S_ISCHR(mode) && !S_ISBLK(mode) &&
>+          !S_ISFIFO(mode) && !S_ISSOCK(mode) && (mode != 0)) {

If you align the two &&s  (^) you can also align ^ the others :)

>+              error = -EINVAL;
>+              goto out_dput;
>+      }

        Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to