On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 19:15 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Wed, 8 August 2007 20:07:34 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 18:16 +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > +static inline void logfs_inc_count(struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > + inode->i_nlink++;
> > > + mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void logfs_dec_count(struct inode *inode)
> > > +{
> > > + inode->i_nlink--;
> > > + mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode);
> > > +}
> > include/linux/fs.h: inode_inc_link_count() inode_dec_link_count() do
> > this. Although not sure they exist in the old kernel your patches are
> > against.
>
> Almost, they call mark_inode_dirty() instead of mark_inode_dirty_sync().
> I wonder if that's necessary.
>
Ah, right, it is necessary as long as you do not have write-back
implemented, sure. Pardon :-)
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
