On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> The grow_dev_page() pages should be reclaimable even though migration
> is not supported for those pages? They were marked movable as it was
> useful for lumpy reclaim taking back pages for hugepage allocations and
> the like. Would it make sense for memory unremove to attempt migration
> first and reclaim second?

Note that a page is still movable even if there is no file system method 
for migration available. In that case the page needs to be cleaned before 
it can be moved.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to