On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:55:40PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> ext2: Simplify some functions
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> fs/ext2/dir.c | 9 ++-------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Index: mm/fs/ext2/dir.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mm.orig/fs/ext2/dir.c 2007-11-28 19:51:05.038882954 -0800
> +++ mm/fs/ext2/dir.c 2007-11-28 19:53:59.074132710 -0800
> @@ -63,8 +63,7 @@ static inline void ext2_put_page(struct
>
> static inline unsigned long dir_pages(struct inode *inode)
> {
> - return (inode->i_size+page_cache_size(inode->i_mapping)-1)>>
> - page_cache_shift(inode->i_mapping);
> + return page_cache_next(inode->i_mapping, inode->i_size);
> }
ok.
> /*
> @@ -74,13 +73,9 @@ static inline unsigned long dir_pages(st
> static unsigned
> ext2_last_byte(struct inode *inode, unsigned long page_nr)
> {
> - unsigned last_byte = inode->i_size;
> struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
>
> - last_byte -= page_nr << page_cache_shift(mapping);
> - if (last_byte > page_cache_size(mapping))
> - last_byte = page_cache_size(mapping);
> - return last_byte;
> + return inode->i_size - page_cache_pos(mapping, page_nr, 0);
I don't think that gives the same return value. The return value
is supposed to be clamped at a maximum of page_cache_size(mapping).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
