interruptible_sleep_on_locked() is just an open-coded
wait_event_interruptible_timeout() with a few assumptions since we know
we hold the BKL.  locks_block_on_timeout() is only used in one place, so
it's actually simpler to inline it into its caller.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 locks.c |   33 ++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 8b8388e..b681459 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -634,33 +634,6 @@ static int flock_locks_conflict(struct file_lock 
*caller_fl, struct file_lock *s
        return (locks_conflict(caller_fl, sys_fl));
 }
 
-static int interruptible_sleep_on_locked(wait_queue_head_t *fl_wait, int 
timeout)
-{
-       int result = 0;
-       DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
-
-       __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-       add_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait);
-       if (timeout == 0)
-               schedule();
-       else
-               result = schedule_timeout(timeout);
-       if (signal_pending(current))
-               result = -ERESTARTSYS;
-       remove_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait);
-       __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
-       return result;
-}
-
-static int locks_block_on_timeout(struct file_lock *blocker, struct file_lock 
*waiter, int time)
-{
-       int result;
-       locks_insert_block(blocker, waiter);
-       result = interruptible_sleep_on_locked(&waiter->fl_wait, time);
-       __locks_delete_block(waiter);
-       return result;
-}
-
 void
 posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
 {
@@ -1256,7 +1229,10 @@ restart:
                if (break_time == 0)
                        break_time++;
        }
-       error = locks_block_on_timeout(flock, new_fl, break_time);
+       locks_insert_block(flock, new_fl);
+       error = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(new_fl->fl_wait,
+                                               !new_fl->fl_next, break_time);
+       __locks_delete_block(new_fl);
        if (error >= 0) {
                if (error == 0)
                        time_out_leases(inode);

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to