On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 09:52:57AM -0700, Gary Funck wrote: > Sounds good. Has anyone run performance tests (eg, Bonnie) on the 2.4 file I/O > performance (ie, using ext2fs) vs. 2.2? What were the results? I did that on my SMP box with some fast IBM SCSI disks lately ... Singlethreaded I/O (bonnie): Write performance unchanged, read performance 10--20% lower with 2.4. Multithreaded I/O (tiobench): Write performance much better for multiple processes, read performance 10% slower with 2.4. Regards, -- Kurt Garloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE GmbH, Nuernberg, FRG SCSI, Security
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Tigran Aivazian
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Andi Kleen
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Matthew Wilcox
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Steve Dodd
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Daniel Phillips
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Gary Funck
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.... Andi Kleen
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in ... Gary Funck
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache... Andi Kleen
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page ... Gary Funck
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.... Kurt Garloff
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.0 Daniel Phillips
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in 2.4.... Chris Mason
- Re: Questions about the buffer+page cache in ... Daniel Phillips
- Tailmerging - detailed design (was: Question... Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tailmerging - detailed design Daniel Phillips