> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 15:46:25 -0800 (PST)
> From: Fenglou Mao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Precedence: bulk
> X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-gcc-outgoing-dig
>
> Dear all,
> I saw glibc-2.0.1, glibc-2.0.2, ..., glibc-2.0.5...
> But Ulrich Drepper released the newest version of glibc-2.0.110.
> I am confused, which one is the newest?
>
> Sincerely Yours,
>
> FengLou Mao
> *******************************
> ADD:Mr. FengLou Mao
> Peking University
> BeiJing
> P.R.China
> Tel:86-10-62751490
> Fax:86-10-62751725
>
>
>
>
>
Sir,
What you are seeing is two different development trees.
One is for glibc 2.0, the other for glibc 2.1
Generally, if you see something like glibc-XXXX-2.0.Y, where Y is
a single digit, that is a release for glibc 2.0. If you see something
like glibc-XXXX-2.0.YYY where YYY is two or three digits, that is a test
release for glibc 2.1.
Also note, 2.0 has been released. I believe that the current version is
2.0.6, which can be found at ftp.gnu.org. There are development releases
in the form glibc-2.0.YpreN at alpha.gnu.org.
2.1 has not been released yet, though I can attest it is getting very close.
You can find development copies at alpha.gnu.org.
I apoligize for sending a blank message a few minutes ago. Slip of the
fingers.
-- todd --
**********************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
